Assume first that is complete. If is integral over , its monic equation and the ultrametric inequality imply , so . Conversely, if , part (i) gives for every -embedding . The coefficients of the minimal polynomial of are elementary symmetric polynomials in its conjugates, so they all lie in . Thus is integral over , proving the integral closure in a finite extension of a complete discretely valued field identity .
Completeness is necessary. Give its -adic absolute value, take , and choose the extension corresponding to the prime above . Thenhas nonnegative valuation at , so it belongs to the chosen valuation ring . At the conjugate prime it has negative valuation, so it does not lie in the integral closure of in . Hence the chosen valuation ring can be strictly larger than the integral closure when the base field is not complete.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.