Let be the inertia group and let denote Frobenius on the residue-field extension. The Relative Weil group isIts Weil-group topology makes an open profinite group with its usual topology and gives the discrete topology. Thus every inertia coset is an open copy of .
Take , the maximal unramified extension of . ThenThe subgroup is open in the discrete Weil-group topology, but it is not open in the profinite topology inherited from .
The main theorem of local class field theory gives a continuous Local Artin mapwith dense image, normalized by sending a uniformizer to a chosen Frobenius. For every finite abelian extension , it induces the Local Artin reciprocity isomorphismThe existence theorem of local class field theory says that the finite-index open subgroups of are exactly the norm subgroups for finite abelian extensions , and that the extension is uniquely determined inside .
Write and . The valuation of a field norm satisfiesso the valuation image of the norm subgroup is . The exact sequence obtained from therefore givesThe left side is by Local Artin reciprocity. Cancelling proves
The cyclotomic extension of a p-adic fieldhas degree , is Galois with group , and is totally ramified. Indeed, is a root of the Eisenstein polynomial
Put . Its polynomial is Eisenstein, so is totally ramified of degree . Every st root of unity lies in by the Teichmuller lifts, so every root of this polynomial lies in . Hence is also Galois.
For either , the norm has every possible valuation because the residue-field degree is one. The norm units in a tamely totally ramified extension lie in the principal units : reduction of a unit norm is the st power of its residue, hence is . Part (b) says that this unit norm subgroup has index , exactly the index of in . ConsequentlyThe uniqueness clause in the existence theorem of local class field theory now gives
One strong form of Hensel lemma is this: if is complete for a discrete valuation , , and satisfiesthen there is a unique root satisfying
Define the Newton iteration over a valued fieldTaylor expansion and the ultrametric inequality show inductively that andThus the valuations of the corrections tend to infinity, so is a Cauchy sequence. Completeness gives a limit , and continuity gives . If is another root in the stated ball, Taylor expansion of shows that the linear term has strictly smaller valuation than all higher terms unless , proving uniqueness.
Every has a unique form with and . Its square class first records . An odd 2-adic unit is a square precisely when it is congruent to modulo : necessity follows by squaring an odd integer, and sufficiency follows from Hensel lemma applied in its standard -adic square-root form.
The odd residues modulo therefore give four unit square classes. Together with valuation parity this yieldsFor example, the classes of , , and form a basis of the square-class group of the 2-adic numbers.
The smallest integer isIndeed, reduction modulo cannot work: the map is the identity on , although not every element of is a th power.
For odd , the p-adic unit group decomposes asRaising to the th power is an automorphism on . On the principal units, the p-adic logarithm identifies it with multiplication by on , soHence whether a unit is a th power is determined exactly by its residue modulo . Equivalently,This is the pth-power criterion for p-adic units.
If is totally ramified and is a uniformizer, then . Factoring by for proves the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups
For , defineThe inertia group acts trivially on , so . Its kernel consists exactly of those for which modulo the maximal ideal, namely . The first isomorphism theorem therefore gives an injection
Let be a root ofThe polynomial is Eisenstein at , so is totally ramified of degree three and . Its discriminant isIts odd valuation makes nonsquare in , so the Galois group of an irreducible cubic shows that the splitting field has Galois group . The quadratic extension obtained by adjoining is ramified, so is totally ramified. Thereforebecause the wild inertia group is the unique Sylow -subgroup of .
It remains to find the wild break. Sinceand is a unit, the different ideal of has exponent . The extension is a tamely ramified quadratic extension and has different exponent one. The different in a tower therefore gives different exponentOn the other hand, the different exponent from ramification groups iswhere is the last index for which . Thus , and
To prove it, let be an automorphism of fixing . The absolute value has a unique extension to every finite extension of the complete field , so it is invariant under . If , the ultrametric inequality and the displayed strict inequality giveBut and invariance gives , a contradiction. Every automorphism fixing therefore fixes , which proves the field inclusion by Galois correspondence.
Now let be finite. By the primitive element theorem, write with separable minimal polynomial . Approximate the coefficients of closely by those of a polynomial of the same degree. Continuity of roots over a non-Archimedean field gives a root of arbitrarily close to . Choose it close enough for Krasner's lemma; thenThe degree bound from forces equality. If and is the prime selected by the embedding , its completion isThus every finite extension of is the completion of a number field at a prime ideal.
Let and let lie over . These primes define two extensions to of the -adic absolute value on . The conjugacy of extensions of a valuation to a normal extension says that some carries the first extension to the second. Equivalently, . This proves the transitivity of the Galois action on primes.
The decomposition group is the stabilizerEach such automorphism extends continuously to the completions, and restriction gives the decomposition group of a prime and local Galois group isomorphism
For the splitting field of , the global Galois group is . Since , the field contains . The local splitting field is therefore , an Eisenstein, totally ramified cyclic extension of degree three. Hence there areprimes of above , and the decomposition group of each is the normal subgroup
For the discrete valuation corresponding to , the valuation ring and its maximal ideal areThe first is a subring of the field , hence an integral domain. An element of is a unit exactly when its valuation is zero, so every nonunit lies in and is the unique maximal ideal.
Choose a uniformizer with . If is an ideal, the set of valuations of its nonzero elements has a least member . Choose with . Then for a unit , so . Every has , hence , and therefore . Thus is a discrete valuation ring, in particular a principal ideal domain.
If is complete and is finite, the unique extension of an absolute value to a finite extension isIt restricts to the given absolute value because for . The usual construction through multiplication by on the finite-dimensional -vector space , together with completeness, proves that this is the only extending absolute value.
Assume first that is complete. If is integral over , its monic equation and the ultrametric inequality imply , so . Conversely, if , part (i) gives for every -embedding . The coefficients of the minimal polynomial of are elementary symmetric polynomials in its conjugates, so they all lie in . Thus is integral over , proving the integral closure in a finite extension of a complete discretely valued field identity .
Completeness is necessary. Give its -adic absolute value, take , and choose the extension corresponding to the prime above . Thenhas nonnegative valuation at , so it belongs to the chosen valuation ring . At the conjugate prime it has negative valuation, so it does not lie in the integral closure of in . Hence the chosen valuation ring can be strictly larger than the integral closure when the base field is not complete.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.