Put
At a fixed alternative , the approximate power of the Wald test increases as its variance
decreases. For fixed total sample size , the allocation problem is therefore
with integer rounding applied after solving the continuous problem. The second-order condition is positivity of the second derivative at the stationary point.
Writing gives and , so apart from the positive factor the variance is
Hence
The unique minimum is
This is the Neyman allocation for the log relative risk of failure.
The expected number of failures is
Holding the alternative and test size fixed, constant power is equivalent to fixing . The ethical allocation problem is therefore
The Lagrange multiplier stationary equations determine the ratio; the second-order condition requires the constrained stationary point to be a local minimum.
For
the stationary equations are
Dividing them gives
The fixed-power constraint then determines the total sample size. Strict convexity after eliminating one variable supplies the second-order minimum condition.
For each substudy define the log-odds treatment effect
The normal random-effects log-likelihood, up to an additive constant, is
Its score equations give
These are the maximum-likelihood estimators rather than the unbiased sample-variance estimator. At an interior solution with , the Hessian in is negative definite, which is the required second-order condition.
Given numerical values of and , maximize the joint log-likelihood over the response rates :
This is a penalized binomial regression problem and can be solved by Newton method or another numerical optimizer. One may alternate this maximization with the closed-form updates for and from part i until convergence. The selected solution should have a negative-definite Hessian in the fitted log-odds parameters.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.