Set . If is in the future lightcone of and in that of , then
Adding and using the triangle inequality gives
Thus the statement is true.
False. Take
with coordinates written as . Both and lie on the future lightcone of , but and are simultaneous and spatially separated, so neither is in the future lightcone of the other.
True. The assumptions give
Adding and applying the triangle inequality proves
so is in the future lightcone of .
False. With coordinates, take
Both separations from are lightlike, but is spacelike.
Again set and write
A boost of velocity gives
Define
The hypothesis says . Put and . Causality gives , while , and , . Therefore
But
Hence at least one of is positive. By continuity, for some physical velocity sufficiently close to that endpoint. In the corresponding inertial frame,
as required.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.