Assume (i). An antipodal map , followed by the inclusion , would be an antipodal map with no zero. Hence (i) implies (ii). Conversely, if an antipodal had no zero, then
would be an antipodal map to . Thus (ii) implies (i).
If is antipodal on the boundary, regard as two copies of glued along their boundary. Use on the upper copy and on the lower copy. The boundary condition makes these definitions agree on the seam, and the resulting map is antipodal. Thus (ii) implies (iii).
Conversely, an antipodal map restricted to a closed hemisphere, identified with , is antipodal on its equatorial boundary. Hence (iii) implies (ii). The three assertions are equivalent; they are standard forms of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.