Proceed by mathematical induction on . The cases are immediate. Given a symmetric chain decomposition of a Boolean lattice , consider one of its chains
It produces the two chains
and, when nonempty,
The first runs from rank to rank , and the second from rank to rank ; both endpoint ranks sum to . They are disjoint and together contain the old chain both without and with . Doing this for every old chain partitions into symmetric chains.
Choose symmetric chain decompositions of and . Their Cartesian products partition into grids . Within one grid, two members in the same row differ only in , and two in the same column differ only in . The hypothesis on therefore permits at most one member in each row and each column. Hence
Because and are even, both symmetric chains have odd length and are centred at ranks and . The grid contains exactly points whose two ranks sum to : they lie on its central antidiagonal. Thus the bound for in each grid is the number of rank- subsets in that grid. Summing over all grids gives
For a sequence in , write for the number of -term subsequences whose sum is zero. We use the following consequence of the Chevalley-Warning theorem: if , then
Indeed, with one variable for each term , apply Chevalley--Warning to
Their degree sum is . A common zero has support of size , or modulo , and each fixed support contributes assignments. Reducing modulo gives the displayed congruence.
Now let the given terms have total sum zero. If no of them summed to zero, delete any one term and apply the congruence to the remaining terms. It gives
so those remaining terms contain a zero-sum -subsequence. Its complement in the original terms has size and sum zero, contradicting the assumption. Therefore the required terms exist.
We use the coefficient form of the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz: if a polynomial of degree has nonzero coefficient at , then it cannot vanish on every product set with .
Write the terms as and, over , put
and
Consider
A direct multinomial-coefficient calculation, using Wilson's theorem, shows that the coefficient of in is nonzero. The Combinatorial Nullstellensatz with every therefore gives an indicator vector for which .
The zero indicator does not work. The first two factors force the selected vectors to have both coordinate sums zero. If the support size is not divisible by , Fermat's little theorem makes , while the final product also vanishes; hence the support has size , , or . Size proves the claim, and size reduces to part (a). For size ,
so the bracket vanishes, again contradicting . Only the size- and reducible size- cases remain, and either yields the required zero-sum -subsequence.
Let denote the stated constant term and suppose every . The rational identity
can be verified after clearing denominators, or by Lagrange interpolation. Multiplying it by the Dyson product and taking constant terms gives the recursion
The multinomial coefficient
obeys the same recursion by the multinomial form of Pascal's identity.
If , taking the constant term in forces the zero term from every factor involving and reduces the expression to the -variable Dyson product with omitted. The same boundary reduction holds for . Finally . Induction on and on therefore proves the Dyson constant-term identity
Identify the additive group with the finite field , where . The sets and each have size , and the field has odd characteristic. The Snevily matching theorem for an elementary abelian group states precisely that for two -element subsets of the additive group of such a field, there is a bijection for which the sums are pairwise distinct.
For context, its polynomial proof antisymmetrizes the Vandermonde polynomial
over all orderings of . The coefficient furnished by the Dyson constant-term identity is a nonzero multiple of ; it cannot vanish because . Therefore at least one ordering makes the Vandermonde product nonzero, which says exactly that
Assume (i). An antipodal map , followed by the inclusion , would be an antipodal map with no zero. Hence (i) implies (ii). Conversely, if an antipodal had no zero, then
would be an antipodal map to . Thus (ii) implies (i).
If is antipodal on the boundary, regard as two copies of glued along their boundary. Use on the upper copy and on the lower copy. The boundary condition makes these definitions agree on the seam, and the resulting map is antipodal. Thus (ii) implies (iii).
Conversely, an antipodal map restricted to a closed hemisphere, identified with , is antipodal on its equatorial boundary. Hence (iii) implies (ii). The three assertions are equivalent; they are standard forms of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem.
For , orthogonally project every member of onto the oriented line . These projections are compact intervals. They are pairwise intersecting because the original sets are, and pairwise intersecting intervals have a common intersection. Let be the midpoint of that common interval and let be its signed coordinate on . Compactness makes continuous, and reversing the orientation gives
Define the continuous antipodal map
The Borsuk-Ulam theorem gives with . Write the common value as . The hyperplane
meets every set in every , because lies in the projection interval of each such set. Thus is the required common hyperplane transversal.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.