For ,
The objective has gradient and Hessian , which is negative definite. Its unique maximizer is therefore
Put and decompose any in the -inner product as
Then
For fixed , a nonzero leaves the mean unchanged and strictly raises variance, so strict monotonicity of excludes it from a maximizer. If and , the zero portfolio has a larger mean and smaller variance, so this is also impossible. Hence every maximizer is
If , the unique variance-minimizing maximizer is , which is the same conclusion with .
Assume first that . Since ,
and for ,
The least-squares affine-regression coefficients are therefore
The minimum is
where
This matrix is symmetric and positive semidefinite. If , then , one may take and arbitrary , and the minimum is , corresponding to .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.