Reversing a word for gives a word of the same length for because every generator is an involution. Applying the same argument to provesA shortest word for followed by gives . Conversely, gives . Hence
We prove the assertion by induction on . Write , where and ; both displayed words are reduced. The first clause of the folding condition and part a imply that is either or .
If , the induction hypothesis deletes one unique letter from the reduced word for . Prefixing gives the required deletion from . If another deletion were possible, induction rules out another internal position, while deletion of would give and hence , contradicting the lengths and .
If , both and increase the length of . Since , the other alternative in the folding condition must hold:Thus , which deletes the first letter. An additional internal deletion would give for a word of length ; multiplying by would make the length- element equal to , impossible. The deletion position is therefore unique in every case.
If , the braid relation in a Coxeter group isFor this is commutation; no relation is imposed when . Two reduced expressions are braid equivalent when one can be transformed into the other by finitely many replacements of one side of such a relation by the other.
First suppose is a Coxeter system. The usual exchange condition implies that multiplication by a simple generator changes length by exactly one. Let be reduced and suppose both and have length . The length of is therefore either or . In the latter case, apply exchange to the reduced word followed by . If exchange deleted one of the , multiplying the resulting equality on the left by would express the length- element using only generators. Hence exchange must delete the initial , giving . This is exactly the folding condition.
Conversely, suppose the folding condition holds, and let be the abstract Coxeter group with generators and matrix . The defining relations hold in , so there is a surjective homomorphismIt remains to prove injectivity. Take any word in the kernel. If its image word in is not reduced, choose its shortest nonreduced prefix , where is reduced and is its last generator. Part b gives , where is obtained by deleting one letter from . Hence , and and are two reduced expressions for the same element. By the assumed braid-equivalence theorem they are related by braid moves. Those moves are defining relations in , after which the end of the prefix becomes and shortens the original word by two.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.