The Khintchine inequality states that for independent Rademacher random variables and every , there are constants such thatThe constants depend only on .
Taking only one nonzero coefficient gives . For the second obstruction, take . On the boxwith sufficiently small, every phase lies in a fixed short arc modulo one. The terms therefore exhibit constructive interference, and the exponential sum has modulus at least throughout the box.
The box has measureIts contribution to the integral is consequently at least . Since , division by givesCombining this with the first obstruction and using proves the stated lower bound.
Let . Orthogonality givesThe number of representations of as two squares is at most a constant times its divisor function. Since , the supplied divisor bound and Cauchy-Schwarz implyFor , monotonicity of norms on gives . For , use to obtainAfter enlarging the constant and the harmless epsilon loss, both ranges give
Choose with a sufficiently small absolute . If an integer satisfies , then for every the phaselies within of an integer. All summands defining therefore have positive real part bounded below, and .
The supplied equidistribution estimate produces such integers in , and distinct integer times are separated by at least one. For , include instead one time , at which both quadratic phases are uniformly small. Discarding endpoints and, if necessary, every other selected integer leaves a set with
The spacetime Fourier support of lies where and . Choose a Schwartz function equal to one on this support and write , whereThis anisotropic reproducing kernel is the quantitative local constancy principle. Its Schwartz decay gives, for every ,Split the convolution at into the stated box and its complement. On the kernel is at most . Outside , choosing in terms of makes its tail at most . Therefore
Take all coefficients equal to one, so . At each , parts a and b, with the negligible tail absorbed, giveThe box has volume . Hölder's inequality therefore yieldsThe time boxes are disjoint because the selected times are one-separated. Summing over givesDividing by and renaming the epsilon loss proves
One form of the trilinear Kakeya inequality in three dimensions is the following. If are finite families of tubes whose directions lie within of , then for every ,The same statement holds for any three uniformly transverse direction caps, with a constant depending on their transversality.
For , the three central radial directions are proportional to . Their determinant is the nonzero Vandermonde productChoose small enough that every triple still has determinant bounded away from zero. An invertible linear transformation sends the three central directions to the standard basis; it sends the given tubes to comparable tubes with directions in fixed small neighborhoods of and distorts volume and dimensions by fixed factors.
Applying part a after this transformation gives, uniformly in the three families,This is the required moment-curve version; its uniformity is precisely the transversality supplied by the moment curve and the Vandermonde determinant.
The three unit normals of any selected blocks remain uniformly linearly independent. Hence the intersection of three thickness-one slabs with these normals has bounded volume, and thereforeExpanding the cube of the requested norm and using nonnegativity givesTaking cube roots proves the estimate with a constant independent of , which is stronger than the allowed factor .
Let partition an -neighborhood of the parabola into caps, and suppose is supported in . The decoupling inequality for the parabola states that for and every ,
For each putMultiplication by enlarges Fourier support by at most because is supported in . The supports of the therefore have uniformly bounded overlap: separated -scale moment-curve intervals remain disjoint except for boundedly many neighbors.
SetFreeze . In the Fourier variables, the functions are supported in caps of tangential length and normal width along the parabola. Apply part a with decoupling scale and critical exponent . Since , for each fixed ,Integrate in . Minkowski's inequality in giveswhich is exactly the claimed inequality after absorbing a change in .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.