A sequence has limit of a sequence ifFor the reciprocal rule, the required condition is . Indeed, eventually , so . The reciprocals are then defined on this tail, andA finite number of zero initial terms does not affect this tail limit of a sequence; if a reciprocal sequence is required at every index, those terms must be excluded or assigned arbitrary values separately.
Rewrite the recurrence relation asSince and , a positive gives a positive . Mathematical induction therefore proves , and also shows that every division in the recurrence relation is defined.
For every , direct algebra givesThus . This identity is the key estimate in Newton iteration for a square root.
For , the preceding parts give a positive denominator and a nonpositive numerator inHence . The restriction matters: if , then .
The tail is a monotone sequence bounded below by zero. The bounded monotone sequence theorem therefore gives . Taking the limit of a sequence in yields , so . The reciprocal rule from part (a) permits passage to the limit of a sequence in the recurrence relation:Multiplication by givesThis proves existence of the positive square root without assuming that existence when constructing the sequence.
Only (ii) is necessarily true. Every real satisfies , so (ii) holds automatically. For a single counterexample to (i) and (iii), choose and . The recurrence relation then gives the nonzero periodic sequenceHere , disproving (i), and , disproving (iii). This counterexample satisfies the requirement that no iterate is zero.
Write . Suppose, for a contradiction, that only finitely many sign changes occur. Since every , the sign is then constant for . Set on that tail. Multiplying the recurrence relation by this constant sign givesConsequently for , and by comparison with a geometric sequence. But positivity of requires at every step, which is incompatible with . Thus the negative-parameter square-root iteration changes sign infinitely often.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.