For every integer , . The series is therefore the negative of the harmonic series:
For a direct divergence argument, each block contributes at least to the positive sum. Its partial sums grow without bound, so
Despite the odd multiples of , the signs do not alternate.
For each fixed , the inner geometric series sums to . Summing this second geometric series gives
All terms are nonnegative, so there is no conditional-rearrangement issue; the iterated sum is finite and the double series converges. Equivalently, collecting equal values of gives .
The positive polynomial root is . Its Taylor expansion near zero is
The starting error is therefore . Consequently
For signed , the magnitude scaling should be written with ; this is the precise interpretation of the proportionality in the question.
The Newton root-finding iteration for this quadratic polynomial is
At , it gives . Its geometric series expansion is . Subtracting the expansion of the polynomial root yields
Use the Exact Newton error identity for a quadratic to expose the cancellation without a long quotient expansion. Put . Since , direct expansion gives
From part (ii), and . It follows that
Thus the stronger result is
The vanishing lower-order terms are a concrete instance of quadratic convergence: to leading order, this step squares the previous error.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.