Write and square the modulus equation. It becomesFor , completing the square gives the Apollonius circleHenceThe printed statement needs the exception : equal distances from and give their perpendicular bisector, a straight line rather than a finite-radius circle. For the center lies in the upper half-plane; this is the case needed in part (ii). The original PDF confirms the numerator , correcting the duplicated, corrupted OCR formula.
For the upper Apollonius circle, let its constant ratio be . Matching the center and radius from part (i) givesSubtracting their squares yields . AlsoThe relevant inverse hyperbolic cosine is positive. Now is the real part of a local holomorphic logarithm, hence a harmonic function away from . The point is inside the excluded disk, because , while is below the real axis. Thus neither singularity lies in the physical domain.
On the numerator and denominator have equal modulus, so the logarithm is zero. On the circular boundary its value is . Therefore the harmonic potential between a grounded line and a circular boundary isThis verifies Laplace's equation and both prescribed Dirichlet boundary conditions. It also tends to zero at infinity. A uniqueness assertion on this unbounded domain would require an additional boundedness or infinity condition; the displayed function is the natural decaying solution requested.
Substituting into the defining Gamma integral givesBoth endpoints are convergent, so no continuation of the Gamma function is needed here.
For real , apply integration by parts to the Gamma integral with and :The boundary term vanishes: at zero, and exponential decay dominates the power at infinity. This proves the Gamma function recurrence
Iterating the Gamma function recurrence gives a meromorphic continuationNear , the numerator is analytic and tends to . Exactly one denominator factor, , vanishes, while all other factors tend to the nonzero product . ThereforeThus . More precisely, the Gamma function residue at a nonpositive integer is . Taking large enough to put in the original right half-plane also shows that this continuation introduces no other finite poles.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.