The printed wording calls cyclic, but its meaning in question 9 is the symmetric group . Under that interpretation, take its planar dihedral group representation, with
Here and . This representation is irreducible over the complex numbers: the two distinct rotation eigenspaces are exchanged by the reflection, so neither is invariant under the whole group. Its character is on the identity, on the two 3-cycles and on the three transpositions. Squaring maps each transposition to the identity and permutes the 3-cycles. Its Frobenius-Schur indicator is therefore
If “cyclic” were intended literally, no two-dimensional complex irreducible representation would exist, since an irreducible representation of a finite abelian group is one-dimensional.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.