An on-axis point illuminator increases spatial coherence. It is not a point object, and it does not remove diffraction. For an ideal aberration-free pupil, coherent imaging is linear in field amplitude and has cutoff
For a real amplitude grating , with and all three field orders inside this pupil, the intensity contrast is . Flat coherent field transfer preserves this contrast; weak input modulation does not itself meet a high resist contrast threshold. Assume a sufficiently high-contrast amplitude mask: for example, gives , exceeding both resist thresholds. Under this assumption, both resists have the same limiting equal-line/space width
This is an approach to the cutoff from below; finite dose latitude, aberrations and a real binary mask can make usable resolution worse. A general coherent intensity image cannot be obtained by applying an incoherent intensity MTF unchanged: , rather than .[ref]
With , this coherent cutoff is : the low-contrast resist improves from roughly to , while the high-contrast resist worsens from roughly to . Coherence improves contrast within its passband but reduces the ultimate bandwidth relative to incoherent illumination.
With the literal Rayleigh-spacing normalization , the same physical cutoff is instead , not . The corresponding widths from the preceding part would improve from roughly and toward . The cutoff in physical units is unambiguous under the stated ideal on-axis model; the claimed direction and size of a change inferred from the plotted normalized axis depend on its definition. Off-axis illumination, partial coherence and arbitrary phase objects require a fuller imaging model.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.