The relation is reflexive because the exceptional set for is empty, and symmetric because the exceptional sets for and agree. If off a null set and off a null set , then off , which is null by part (b). Hence it is transitive as well, so equality almost everywhere is an equivalence relation.
For each , let be the null set where . Their union is null. At any , the two sequences agree term by term, so their pointwise limits are equal: . Therefore . Taking the countable union first is essential: it produces one exceptional set outside which all equalities hold simultaneously.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.