Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford / 2020 / 1 / c

Define $\mathcal{M}$ by removing the factor $i(2\pi {)}^4{\delta }^{(4)}(p_1+p_2-p_3-p_4)$ from the connected transition matrix element. The single tree-level Feynman diagram in i givesThere is no identical-particle exchange term because the species differ. Each incoming fermion has two equally populated spin angular momentum states in an unpolarized beam. Their probabilities multiply to $1/4$, giving a spin average over the four initial choices. The unobserved final spin angular momentum states are distinct outcomes, so their probabilities are added by a spin sum, with no final averaging:Taking the complex conjugate of ${\bar{u}}_3{u}_1$ gives ${\bar{u}}_1{u}_3$. The fermion spin sum therefore converts each squared bilinear into a gamma-matrix trace:Using $\mathrm{tr}1=4$, $\mathrm{tr}{\gamma }^{\mu }=0$, $\mathrm{tr}({\gamma }^{\mu }{\gamma }^{\nu })=4{\eta }^{\mu \nu }$, and the mass shell conditions $p_j^2=m^2$, each gamma-matrix trace isThe second equality follows from $q^2=2m^2-2p_1\cdot p_3$; momentum conservation gives the identical result for $p_2,p_4$. HenceThe printed prefactor $g^2$ is incorrect for the stated coupling. Each of the two Yukawa interaction vertices contributes one $g$ to the scattering amplitude, so its square is proportional to $g^4$. As a concrete counterexample, take $g=2$, $m>0$, and forward elastic kinematics $p_3=p_1$, $p_4=p_2$. Then $q^2=0$ and the spin average is $16g^4=256$, whereas the printed expression gives $16g^2=64$.