The centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is
The Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality gives, for example,
This valid constant follows from the disjoint-interval covering argument: a compact subset of the superlevel set has a finite cover by intervals of average above ; select disjoint intervals whose triples cover it, bound their total length by , and use inner regularity. An optimal constant is not required.
Let denote the upper limit of the displayed mean oscillation as . For a continuous integrable approximation , continuity gives . With , the triangle inequality yields
Therefore the maximal inequality and Chebyshev's inequality give
Density makes the right side arbitrarily small. For each positive rational the exceptional set is null, proving almost everywhere, the Lebesgue differentiation theorem. Values where the chosen representative is not finite already form a null set.
For the fundamental theorem define , with oriented integration for . This function is absolutely continuous: for disjoint intervals the sum of is at most the integral of over their union, which is small when its measure is small by absolute continuity of the integral. At a Lebesgue point of , for ,
Thus almost everywhere and . Differentiability at every point is not claimed for an arbitrary integrable function.
For a set of finite measure apply the preceding result to . Since its local average minus its point value is bounded in absolute value by its mean absolute oscillation, it gives
For a general measurable , apply the same argument to . At every interior point of , sufficiently short averages agree with those of . The countable union of these interiors covers the line, and a countable union of null exceptional sets remains null. This proves the Lebesgue density theorem without a finite-measure assumption on . The source's is the indicator of .
Every in the maximal superlevel set has a first index at which the average on its unique cell exceeds . Refinement implies that all earlier cells containing contain this cell, and their averages are at most . Thus and the selected cells cover the superlevel set.
Two cells at different levels are either disjoint or nested, because of refinement and the partition property. If selected cells of levels intersect, the level- one lies in the earlier cell whose average is above , contradicting its first-crossing property. Cells at the same level are disjoint unless identical. Hence the selected cells form a countable disjoint partition of the superlevel set. A cell repeated unchanged at successive levels is counted once, at its first crossing; equal earlier ancestors are included in the comparison condition.
The first-crossing maximal inequality for refining partitions follows from countable disjointness and the strict average bound:
Thus this partition maximal operator has weak-type constant one.
The conclusion of differentiation along refining metric partitions is
The crucial geometric property is shrinking diameter, not merely refinement: since and , continuity makes the corresponding oscillation tend to zero for every continuous test function. Continuous approximation and the maximal inequality then transfer this to , exactly as before: the exceptional-set bound is for an oscillation threshold . Countability makes the maximal function measurable, and positive cell measure makes every average defined. Refinement supplied the disjoint first-crossing argument; shrinking diameter supplies differentiation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.