Using set difference as an intersection with a complement of a set, and using double negation, givesInterchanging the two sets simply interchanges the two terms of this union, whose commutativity gives
We use a double inclusion proof. First, let . If , then , since otherwise . Hence in this case . If , then , since otherwise . Hence in this case . This proves the first set inclusion.
Conversely, an element of belongs to neither nor . An element of also belongs to neither set difference. Thus every element of lies outside , proving the reverse set inclusion. Therefore
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.