Because and are independent random variables, their product's expected value factors:The original independence assumption is essential to this factorization.
For the overlapping products, factor using the independence of :This is the covariance of overlapping independent products: the shared contributes its second moment. In contrast, and use disjoint independent factors and are themselves independent, giving
Assume finite second moments and write . Expanding the squared centered sum givesThis variance of a sum identity does not require independence; the covariance term records the contribution that would otherwise be lost.
For finite second moments, the general variance of a sum formula isEach distinct unordered pair appears once in the second sum and twice when the full square is expanded. No independence assumption is needed.
Put for . Independence of the underlying exponentials gives andBy the covariance of overlapping independent products, adjacent terms have covariance one. Terms separated by at least two indices use disjoint independent factors, so their covariance is zero. There are adjacent pairs. Linearity of expectation and the variance of a sum formula therefore yieldIn particular, the products themselves are not independent merely because the original are.
The normalized sum has mean one and variance . For every fixed , the Chebyshev inequality givesThis proves the requested limit, and in fact proves convergence in probability of to one. It is a finite covariance range weak law: adjacent dependence is harmless here because only linearly many covariance terms survive.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.