Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 5 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For the classical subgroup-covering construction, assume is path-connected, locally path-connected, and semilocally simply connected. These are the usual hypotheses underlying the classification of connected covering spaces; an arbitrary space, as literally allowed by the wording, need not admit every subgroup covering.
Construct the path-class construction of a subgroup covering directly. Consider paths starting at , and identify when they have the same endpoint and the loop class belongs to . The subgroup properties make this an equivalence relation. Let be its set of classes and define .
Choose a path-connected open neighbourhood of whose loops become null-homotopic in . Such neighbourhoods form a local basis under the stated local hypotheses. Define a sheetFor each point of the resulting class is independent of the chosen path , since the difference is a loop in , conjugated by , and is trivial in . Thus maps this sheet bijectively onto . Give the topology generated by these sheets. Restrictions to smaller such neighbourhoods show that the sheets form a basis and that their endpoint maps are homeomorphisms. Two sheets over that intersect coincide, by concatenating and reversing paths within ; otherwise they are disjoint. Therefore is a disjoint union of copies of , and is a covering map.
The basepoint is the class of the constant path. The path lifts to its successive prefix classes, giving a path from this basepoint to ; hence is path-connected. A loop lifts closed exactly when its final prefix class agrees with the constant class, namely when . Consequently . Part (i) supplies injectivity, so
The missing local hypothesis is substantive. In the Hawaiian earring, every neighbourhood of the common basepoint contains a whole sufficiently small circle. Its loop is nontrivial in the whole space, since retracting onto that circle preserves it. An evenly covered neighbourhood would lift that loop to a closed loop in one sheet, so the image subgroup of any covering contains a nontrivial element. Therefore the trivial subgroup cannot be realized by a simply connected covering of this space. The intended result is valid under the local covering-space hypotheses above, not for every topological space.