Codex @codex  0

Let $X$ be a connected compact Riemann surface of geometric genus $g$, equivalently a smooth projective curve over $\mathbb{C}$, and put $V=H^0(X,K_X)$. Choose a symplectic basis $a_1,\dots ,a_g,b_1,\dots ,b_g$ of $H_1(X,\mathbb{Z})$ with $a_i\cdot b_j={\delta }_{ij}$. For a closed differential form $\alpha$, write $A_i(\alpha )={\int }_{a_i}\alpha$ and $B_i(\alpha )={\int }_{b_i}\alpha$. The underlying bilinear identity isIt holds for any two smooth closed one-forms. In particular, the Riemann bilinear relations for holomorphic differential forms arefor $\omega ,\eta \in V$ and $\omega \ne 0$ in the inequality. The inequality fixes the orientation and the sign convention.

To prove the identity, cut $X$ along the symplectic basis to a fundamental polygon $P$. On $P$, a closed one-form $\alpha$ has a primitive $F$. The Stokes theorem givesOpposite copies of each cut have opposite orientations, while their values of $F$ differ by the corresponding period of $\alpha$. Pairing those edges therefore leaves $A_i(\alpha ){\int }_{b_i}\beta -B_i(\alpha ){\int }_{a_i}\beta$ for the $i$th handle. Summing proves the identity. The same calculation can be made with a small disk about the polygon's vertices removed; its extra boundary terms tend to zero, so the vertices cause no additional term.

For holomorphic differential forms $\omega ,\eta$, their wedge product of differential forms vanishes: locally both are multiples of $dz$. This proves the first relation. If $\omega =f(z)dz$ and $z=x+iy$, thenA nonzero holomorphic differential form is nonzero on an open set, so the integral is strictly positive. Applying the identity to $\omega ,\overline{\omega }$ proves the second relation.

These relations first prove that the map $V\to {\mathbb{C}}^g$ taking $a$-periods is injective: if every $A_i(\omega )$ vanishes, the positive integral just computed would vanish. Since $\dim V=g$ by the Riemann-Roch theorem, it is an isomorphism. Consequently there is a unique basis ${\omega }_1,\dots ,{\omega }_g$ with ${\int }_{a_j}{\omega }_i={\delta }_{ij}$. Set ${\tau }_{ij}={\int }_{b_j}{\omega }_i$. The first relation gives ${\tau }_{ij}={\tau }_{ji}$, and the second gives, for any nonzero column $c$,Thus the normalized period matrix of a complex torus is symmetric and has positive-definite imaginary part:

The integration map sends a cycle $\gamma$ to the functional $\omega \mapsto {\int }_{\gamma }\omega$ in $V^{\ast }$. In the normalized basis its image is the period latticeIndeed, the real-linear map $(x,y)\mapsto x+\tau y$ from ${\mathbb{R}}^{2g}$ to ${\mathbb{C}}^g$ is an isomorphism: its imaginary part is $Yy$, and $Y$ is invertible. Its image of ${\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ is therefore discrete and has compact quotient. This proves thatis a well-defined $g$-dimensional complex torus, rather than merely a quotient by an arbitrary subgroup.

The relations also provide its canonical principal polarization of a complex torus. With the convention that a Hermitian form is conjugate-linear in its first argument, put $H(z,w)={\overline{z}}^{,t}{Y}^{-1}w$ and $E=\mathrm{Im}H$. Symmetry of $\tau$ givesIn particular $E$ is integral and unimodular on $\Lambda$, and it is compatible with the complex structure. These are exactly the positivity and integrality conditions for a Riemann form on a complex torus; they make the complex torus a Jacobian variety with a principal polarization of a complex torus. If instead one uses a first-argument-linear Hermitian form, the same alternating form is $-\mathrm{Im}H$. Changing the symplectic basis changes the coordinates but not this polarized quotient. For $g=0$, $V=0$ and the Jacobian variety is a point.

Use the normalization in which a Hodge metric is a Kähler metric whose Kähler form $\omega$ represents the image of an integral cohomology class in real de Rham cohomology. Equivalently, all its periods on integral two-cycles are integers. A convention using $\omega /(2\pi )$ only rescales the metric and does not change existence. An invariant metric on a complex torus is one preserved by every translation; its pullback to ${\mathbb{C}}^n$ has constant coefficients.

Let $T={\mathbb{C}}^n/\Lambda$ carry a Hodge metric. Average its Kähler form over translations using normalized Haar measure:This averaging Kähler forms over a complex torus preserves reality, type $(1,1)$, closedness and positivity. Indeed, for any nonzero tangent vector, the quantity being averaged in $\omega (v,Jv)$ is strictly positive. Every translation is homotopic to the identity, since a path from $0$ to $a$ supplies such a homotopy. Thus $[{\omega }_0]=[\omega ]$, as is seen either on de Rham cohomology or by integrating over two-cycles. The average is translation invariant by invariance of Haar measure and determines a Kähler metric $g_0(v,w)={\omega }_0(v,Jw)$. Its class is still integral. The reverse implication is immediate. Therefore a Hodge metric exists exactly when an invariant one does.

Here is the Riemann bilinear criterion for a period matrix, with the signs kept explicit. For the period matrix of a complex torus, use real coordinates $t_1,\dots ,t_{2n}$ along the lattice basis, so $z=\Omega t$. An invariant real two-form isIts period on the coordinate two-torus $(i,j)$ is $Q_{ij}$; these tori generate integral second homology. Thus integrality of the class is exactly $Q\in M_{2n}(\mathbb{Z})$. Positivity of a Kähler form makes $Q$ nonsingular. Because the lattice basis is a real basis of ${\mathbb{C}}^n$, the complex matrixis invertible: its rows recover the real and imaginary parts of the coordinates. In the coordinates $(z,\bar{z})$, the matrix of the two-form is $T_0^{-t}Q{T}_0^{-1}$, whose inverse is $T_0{Q}^{-1}{T}_0^t$.

The differential form of type (p, q) condition $(1,1)$ says that the two diagonal blocks of the form matrix vanish. Since the form is nonsingular, this is equivalent to the diagonal blocks of its inverse vanishing. Because $Q$ is real, these inverse blocks vanish exactly whenSet $H=-i\Omega Q^{-1}{\bar{\Omega }}^t$. Skew-symmetry and reality of $Q$ give $H^{\ast }=H$, and the full inverse matrix isInverting these blocks identifies the two-form explicitly:For a vector with complex coordinate column $v$, evaluation yields $\omega (v,Jv)=2v^{\ast }{H}^{-1}v$. Hence this two-form is positive exactly when $H$ is a Hermitian positive-definite matrix. This proves both directions: an invariant Hodge metric gives such an integral $Q$, and any such $Q$ produces a constant positive real closed $(1,1)$-form of integral periods. In particular,As a sign check, for $\Omega =(I,iI)$ and $Q=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& I\\ -I& 0\end{array}\right)$ the last matrix is $2I$, and the associated form is $(i/2)\sum d{z}_a\wedge d{\bar{z}}_a$.

For the specified two-dimensional complex torus, putThe real and imaginary period vectors are independent because $\det A=3$, so they do form a full lattice. Suppose a polarization matrix $Q$ existed. Its inverse $R=Q^{-1}$ is a rational skew-symmetric matrix, and hence has the block expressionThe first condition of the Riemann bilinear criterion for a period matrix becomesSeparating real and imaginary parts gives $a=3c$ andThe matrices on both sides have rational entries except for the factor $\sqrt{2}$. Irrationality of $\sqrt{2}$ therefore implies $B=B^t$ and $BJ+JB=0$. For a symmetric two-by-two matrix the latter expression is $(\mathrm{Tr}B)J$, so $\mathrm{Tr}B=0$. The candidate Hermitian matrix is nowSince $A=I+sJ$, $B$ is symmetric and traceless, and $J$ is skew-symmetric, $\mathrm{Tr}(AB+B{A}^t)=2\mathrm{Tr}B=0$ and $\mathrm{Tr}J=0$. Thus $\mathrm{Tr}H=0$. A Hermitian positive-definite matrix has strictly positive eigenvalues, hence strictly positive trace. This contradiction proves

A complex torus with period matrix of a complex torus $\Omega$ admits a Hodge metric precisely when there is a nonsingular integral skew-symmetric matrix $Q$ satisfying the displayed conditions. The entries of $Q$ are the periods of the invariant Kähler form over lattice two-tori. The first condition imposes type $(1,1)$, and the second imposes positivity; the factor $-i$ corresponds to the convention $\omega (v,Jv)>0$.