Effective stress 2026-10-25
The load carried by the solid skeleton or contacts after allowing for pore fluid pressure. In compression-positive form an elementary law is ; the contact approximation often takes . Fixed-total-stress pressure changes translate a Mohr circle without changing its radius.
Hydraulic opening of a mineral vein 2026-10-25
A fluid-filled fracture can open perpendicular to the least compressive principal stress. In a compression-positive contact approximation, effective stress is . Opening an initially intact plane of tensile strength requiresA sufficiently weak pre-existing crack can open near zero effective compression. Increasing isotropic pore fluid pressure translates all effective principal stresses without rotating their directions, so an opening fracture and a frictional normal fault can record compatible stress axes at different pressure episodes. Subsequent mineral precipitation creates a mineral vein; white appearance alone does not identify its filling mineral.
A numerical answer needs an assumption about fault orientation. For a cohesionless fault optimally oriented for Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, with vertical , write for the internal friction angle and for the fault dip. The angle between the plane and is , so the optimal normal-fault dip relation givesHence under that model.
For the Mohr circle, plot effective compression horizontally and shear stress vertically. Draw a circle with diameter tangent to . Its centre and radius obey . One illustrative normalization is , , with tangency at the resolved stresses on the plane. Pore fluid pressure shifts the total-stress circle horizontally; the friction law uses effective stress.
Original normalized Mohr circles for optimally oriented normal faults: different dips imply different tangent slopes only under the stated failure model
. Details. The dip does not determine the actual sliding coefficient of friction without the optimal-orientation assumption. A reactivated inherited plane may be nonoptimal, cohesion may matter, and the stress ratio and pore fluid pressure are not measured. For an arbitrary compression-positive stress state,at cohesionless sliding. Thus the requested single value is a conditional inference, not a friction measurement.
Choose coordinates and use compression-positive effective stress. One possible tensor, in MPa, isIts ordered principal stresses are vertical , north–south and east–west . On the east-dipping plane,so , as required by the conditional friction estimate. The scale is illustrative: no absolute stress magnitude is supplied. A corresponding total stress tensor is for any specified isotropic pore fluid pressure .
For an approximately isotropic elastic solid,where is bulk modulus, is shear modulus and is mass density. Five relevant controls are:
- Mineral composition and texture: different elastic moduli and densities give different seismic velocities; compliant clay-rich material generally differs from crystalline igneous framework rock.
- Porosity, cracks and fractures: compliant voids reduce the effective moduli and usually reduce both speeds; aligned fractures produce seismic anisotropy.
- Effective confinement: increasing effective stress closes compliant cracks and tends to raise speeds. Higher pore fluid pressure at fixed total confinement can reopen or preserve cracks and lower the effective stiffness.
- Fluid saturation and phase: replacing gas by liquid commonly increases the saturated bulk modulus and ; fluids have no static shear rigidity, so changes through the frame, density and frequency-dependent interactions rather than a direct fluid shear modulus.
- Temperature and alteration: heating commonly reduces elastic moduli and may create thermal cracks; hydrothermal alteration can replace strong minerals by clay or other weaker phases. The sign depends on alteration products and crack sealing, so reservoir-specific measurements are needed.
These controls interact: a dense rock is not automatically faster if its moduli are also different.
For an approximately isotropic rock, the P wave and S wave speeds arewhere is bulk modulus, is shear modulus, and is density. Five important controls are:
- Mineralogy and cementation. Stiff, well-cemented mineral frameworks usually have higher elastic modulus values and faster seismic velocities than poorly consolidated sediments. Density alone is insufficient: both stiffness and density enter the equations.
- Porosity and cracks. Larger porosity, especially compliant cracks, usually lowers effective elastic modulus values and seismic velocities. Crack orientation can make the seismic velocities direction-dependent through seismic anisotropy.
- Pore-fluid composition and saturation. Replacing liquid water by gas generally lowers the effective bulk modulus sharply and reduces . Pore fluids have negligible static shear modulus; responds chiefly through the solid framework and the changed bulk density, rather than through a shear restoring force in the fluid.
- Effective confining pressure. Increasing effective stress closes cracks and improves grain contacts, usually increasing both seismic velocities. Increasing pore fluid pressure at fixed total stress reduces effective stress and can reverse this trend.
- Temperature. At otherwise comparable conditions, increasing temperature generally softens minerals and lowers seismic velocities; thermal cracking or partial melting can lower them further. Increasing burial commonly increases both temperature and pressure, so their separate effects need not have the same sign.
The measured core seismic velocities should therefore be checked against in-situ saturation, effective stress, and temperature; laboratory values need not transfer unchanged offshore.
Assume an initially unfractured homogeneous isotropic material described by a linear Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, with the given coefficient of friction representing the relevant internal friction angle. Use spatially uniform pore fluid pressure, effective stresses , and compression-positive signs. ThenThe Mohr circle in the plane has centre and radius . At first failure it is tangent to the failure envelope. The radius to the positive-shear tangent point is perpendicular to the line of slope , hence makes angle with the positive normal-stress axis.
If is the angle between the fault normal and , the stress transformation isThus , , and the angle of the fault itself to horizontal isThe two conjugate thrust faults therefore strike approximately east–west and dip about north and south. This is the fault dip, not the fault-normal angle. Both sediments and basement have the same optimum orientation under these assumptions because their stipulated friction slopes are equal; their cohesion and absolute failure stresses could still differ.
The first two panels in solution give the labeled construction. Constant cohesion shifts the straight failure envelope without changing its slope, and uniform pore fluid pressure translates the Mohr circle in normal-stress coordinates; neither changes this tangency angle. In the illustrative cohesionless case, , giving . Pre-existing weaknesses, a nonuniform stress field, anisotropic strength, or a nonlinear failure envelope invalidate the simple optimum-orientation prediction.[ref]
Stress and strength lecture notes by MIT OpenCourseWare. Lecture 10 develops the traction, pore-pressure and Mohr-circle framework; the signs and angle definitions above specify the convention used here.
The result predicts initial failure in a uniform material under the assumed principal-stress orientations. The actual Figure 3 is a present-day NW–SE cross section through a thick, heterogeneous Alpine stack, extending to about 50 km depth. It contains near-horizontal basal stretches, curved ramps, tightly bent contacts, and steep structures in the internal zones around Viso and the Dora Maira complex. It does not show a single undeformed conjugate pair newly formed in horizontal uniform rock.
Several processes explain the departures:
- Mechanical layering and inherited weaknesses. Faults can follow weak bedding, old fault planes, or contacts with lower friction or cohesion than the surrounding rock. These can form shallow décollements linked by steeper ramps. Figure 2 explicitly distinguishes the near-surface red “geophysical bedrock” boundary at a few hundred metres from the much deeper crystalline basement beneath the Jurassic, Triassic and Permian cover. An age label or a seismic contrast alone does not establish a friction coefficient; clay-rich or evaporite detachments are possibilities to test, not lithologies proved by that drawing.
- Rotation after formation. Continuing tectonic shortening, folding, stacking and fault slip can rotate an initially optimal fault plane to steeper or shallower present-day fault dips. A steep older structure may be inherited from an earlier deformation episode rather than created at its present orientation.
- Curved faults and local stresses. Faults bend through a layered crust; local principal stress axes rotate near topography, ramps and interacting faults. The optimum angle is measured relative to the local , not necessarily to the regional horizontal direction everywhere.
- Changing strength and deformation mechanism. Spatial changes in pore fluid pressure, coefficient of friction, cohesion and temperature alter which surfaces reactivate. At depth, ductile deformation can replace frictional brittle failure, so the same new-fracture construction need not apply throughout the section.
Finally, a section shows apparent dip unless it is perpendicular to fault strike. For an ideal plane, , where is the angle between the section direction and fault strike. Obliquity can make a plane look shallower, but cannot on its own explain an apparent dip steeper than its true dip. Do not infer that each black curve is a currently active brittle earthquake fault.
Pore fluid pressure reduces the compressive load carried across grain contacts or an accessible fault. In the usual elementary approximation,At fixed total stress, increasing translates the entire Mohr circle left by without changing its radius or the differential stress. The circle therefore approaches the frictional failure envelope even though the applied shear has not increased. Equivalently, in total-stress coordinates the strength on an existing plane is , reduced by . For a known orientation and constant frictional parameters, the ideal critical pressure isprovided the plane is in contact and sliding failure is reached before tensile opening.
For the diagram's illustrative , , and , the dry circle is below failure. The freely oriented tangency threshold is about ; the circle is already beyond that threshold and shows the loading tendency, not a stable post-failure state. If grows enough that , fluid pressure can instead open a tensile fracture. A porous-continuum effective stress law may use with a coefficient different from one. Also, changing fluid pressure can change total stress through constrained deformation; pure horizontal translation assumes those total stresses remain fixed.[ref]
Stress and strength lecture notes by MIT OpenCourseWare. Lecture 10, frictional strength modified by pore-fluid pressure.
Soil liquefaction 2026-10-25
Loss of strength in suitable water-saturated granular material when rising pore fluid pressure reduces the effective contact load, often during cyclic earthquake shaking. It is distinct from the condensation of a gas.
12.005 Applications of Continuum Mechanics to Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, spring 2006, Lecture 10. Traction, frictional strength, pore fluid pressure and Mohr circle construction. These notes use a particular sign convention; conversions must preserve it.
