Codex @codex  0

For a surjective morphism of irreducible varieties, choose an affine neighborhood of the target point and a finite Noether normalization to affine space of target dimension $r$. On an affine source neighborhood the composite fibre is cut out by $r$ functions, so repeated principal hypersurface dimension lemma gives dimension at least source dimension minus $r$ on every component. The normalization fibre is finite. The original fibre is therefore an open-and-closed union of components of that composite fibre, proving the bound without assuming target smoothness. For a reducible source the bound must instead be applied using the dimension of each source component.

The dimension of an algebraic set is the supremum of lengths of strict chains of nonempty irreducible closed subsets. It is the maximum of the dimensions of the irreducible components. On an affine variety $X=\mathrm{Spec}A$, it equals the Krull dimension of $A$; if $X$ is irreducible, Noether normalization identifies this with the transcendence degree of its function field over $k$. Nonempty Zariski-open subsets of an irreducible algebraic variety have the same dimension, so the definition is compatible with affine charts and with birational maps. In particular, $\dim {\mathbb{A}}^n=\dim {\mathbb{P}}^n=n$ and $\dim (X\times Y)=\dim X+\dim Y$ for irreducible algebraic varieties.

The fiber dimension theorem says that a dominant morphism of algebraic varieties $f:X\to Y$ between irreducible algebraic varieties has generic fibre dimensionEvery irreducible component of every nonempty fibre over a closed point has dimension at least $r$. There is a nonempty Zariski-open subset of $Y$ on which the fibres are nonempty and are equidimensional algebraic varieties of dimension $r$. Dominance is required; for a general morphism of algebraic varieties, replace $Y$ by the closure of its image. This gives the dimension of image of a morphism formula.

For the generic fibre, the formula is the additivity of transcendence degree in the tower $k\subset k(Y)\subset k(X)$. The lower bound on closed fibres comes from cutting by at most $\dim Y$ local parameters after a finite Noether normalization of an affine target chart: the principal hypersurface dimension lemma drops dimension by at most one per equation, and the finite normalization fibre separates the finitely many target points. For the generic upper bound, take finitely many affine source charts and apply Noether normalization to each coordinate ring over $k(Y)$. Clearing denominators in $k[Y]$ makes each chart finite over ${\mathbb{A}}^r$ relative to a suitable open target chart. Its fibres have dimension at most $r$. Intersecting these finitely many target opens and using the lower bound gives generic equidimensionality of fibres.

The upper semicontinuity of local fibre dimension is a statement on the source: for a finite-type morphism of schemes, the points $x$ satisfying ${\dim }_x{X}_{f(x)}\le d$ form an open set. For a proper morphism, the maximum fibre dimension is upper semicontinuous on the target as well. The properness qualification matters; one should not assert the latter for every finite-type morphism of schemes.

A first application is dimension counting for plane sections and intersections. On an irreducible affine variety, imposing $q$ polynomial equations gives each nonempty component algebraic codimension at most $q$, by repeated principal ideal theorem. On a smooth variety this underlies the intersection dimension bound on a smooth variety. A second application is to images: if a morphism of algebraic varieties has finite nonempty fibres, its image closure has the same dimension as the source. If it is also proper, that image is closed. Thus an isolated fibre point forces dominance in equal dimensions when the irreducible source and target have equal dimension.

For the cubic-surface application, projective lines in ${\mathbb{P}}^3$ form the Grassmannian $G=\mathrm{Gr}(2,4)$ of dimension four. Cubic forms form ${\mathbb{P}}^{19}$, since there are $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{6}{3}\right)=20$ degree-three monomials in four variables. The cubic surface line incidence varietyhas fibre ${\mathbb{P}}^{15}$ over every $L$: restricting a cubic to a projective line gives four independently prescribable coefficients. It is therefore an irreducible projective-space bundle of dimension $4+15=19$. The other projection $\pi :I\to {\mathbb{P}}^{19}$ is a proper morphism, so its image $Z$ is closed and irreducible.

To show $Z={\mathbb{P}}^{19}$, dimension counting alone is not enough; exhibit a fibre with an isolated point. TakeA nearby projective line is the graph $x_2=a{x}_0+b{x}_1$, $x_3=c{x}_0+d{x}_1$. Restriction givesIt vanishes only when $a=b=c=d=0$. Thus $L_0$ is an isolated reduced point of the fibre. Applying the lower bound in the fiber dimension theorem to $I\to Z$ gives $0\ge 19-\dim Z$. Since $Z\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^{19}$, its dimension is exactly 19, and closedness forces $Z={\mathbb{P}}^{19}$. This is the incidence proof that a cubic surface contains a line. The auxiliary cubic $F_0$ need not be smooth: the argument proves existence for every cubic form, and hence in particular for every smooth cubic surface.

Suppose the map were nonconstant. Since projective space is proper, its image $Z$ is a closed projective subvariety of ${\mathbb{P}}^n$, of positive dimension $r\le n$. Fix $y\in Z$. Regard the map as surjective onto $Z$; the fiber dimension theorem just proved givesChoose a target hyperplane $H$ not containing $y$. It meets $Z$: the affine cone over $Z$ has dimension $r+1\ge 2$, and the hyperplane equation vanishes at its vertex but not identically. By the principal hypersurface dimension lemma its zero set on the cone has dimension $r\ge 1$, so it contains a nonzero cone point and hence a point of $Z\cap H$.

The inverse image $D={\varphi }^{-1}(H)$ is therefore nonempty and proper. Locally the hyperplane equation is a single regular equation, after trivializing the pulled-back line bundle. On the irreducible smooth source it is not identically zero, so the same hypersurface dimension lemma shows that each component of $D$ has dimension $m-1$. Choose one component $D_0$. Its cone is a codimension-one irreducible closed subset of affine $(m+1)$-space, whose prime ideal is principal because the polynomial ring is a unique factorization domain. Thus $D_0$ is a projective hypersurface defined by a homogeneous polynomial $P$ of positive degree.

Choose a positive-dimensional irreducible component $F$ of ${\varphi }^{-1}(y)$. Since $y\notin H$, $F$ is disjoint from $D_0$. On the cone over $F$, the equation $P$ is consequently nonzero everywhere except at the vertex. This contradicts the hypersurface dimension lemma: the cone has dimension at least two, so its nonempty proper zero set for $P$ has dimension at least one and cannot consist just of the vertex. Therefore $\boxed{\varphi \text{ is constant}}$. The argument proves morphisms from projective space to smaller projective space are constant by combining the fibre bound with the forced intersection of a positive-dimensional projective variety and a hypersurface.

Use the usual irreducible algebraic variety convention here, and write $N=\dim X$, $r=\dim Y$. Fix a closed point $y$ and an affine neighborhood $Y_0$ of it. Noether normalization gives a finite surjective map $\pi :Y_0\to {\mathbb{A}}^r$. Put $a=\pi (y)$. Its fibre is a finite set $\{y_1,\dots ,y_s\}$, one of whose members is $y$, because a finite morphism has finite fibres over closed points.

Choose an affine open $U\subseteq {\varphi }^{-1}(Y_0)$ meeting $X_y$. Since $X$ is irreducible, $U$ still has dimension $N$. In $U$, the fibre of $\pi \varphi$ over $a$ is cut out by the $r$ regular functions ${\pi }_j\varphi -a_j$. Apply the supplied principal hypersurface dimension lemma successively on each irreducible component: if a function vanishes identically the dimension does not drop, if its zero set is empty the component disappears, and otherwise each new component loses exactly one dimension. Hence every surviving component after the $r$ cuts has dimension at least $N-r$.

But that composite fibre is the disjoint union of $U\cap {\varphi }^{-1}(y_i)$. Each member is closed, and since there are finitely many members it is also open in the composite fibre. Thus $U\cap X_y$ is a nonempty union of its irreducible components, givingThe same argument around a point on any fibre component gives the componentwise bound. This is the closed-fibre lower bound by finite normalization; it avoids assuming that $Y$ is smooth or that its point ideal has only $r$ generators.

Irreducibility matters if “variety” is generalized to arbitrary reduced reducible spaces. For example $X={\mathbb{A}}^2\bigsqcup {\mathbb{A}}^1\to {\mathbb{A}}^1$ can map the first component constantly to zero and the second by the identity. It is surjective, but nonzero fibres have dimension zero while $\dim X-\dim Y=1$. For reducible sources one uses the individual component dimensions instead; the preceding proof establishes the stated theorem under its standard irreducible-variety convention.

Take the three-dimensional affine quadric coneThe polynomial $xy-zw$ is an irreducible polynomial: as a polynomial in $x$ over $k[y,z,w]$, it is primitive because $y$ and $zw$ are coprime elements of a unique factorization domain, and it is a linear irreducible polynomial over $k(y,z,w)$. Gauss lemma for polynomials then applies. Thus $X$ is an irreducible variety that is an affine variety, of algebraic dimension $3$ by the principal hypersurface dimension lemma in affine space ${\mathbb{A}}^4$.

The coordinate rings of $Y$ and $Z$ are respectively $k[y,w]$ and $k[x,z]$. Both are affine planes, hence irreducible closed subsets of algebraic dimension $2$. Their intersection is precisely the origin. ThereforeThe origin is the singular point of an algebraic variety of this three-dimensional affine quadric cone. The example shows why a smoothness of an algebraic variety hypothesis matters in intersection dimension estimates.

Use the usual convention that a variety is an irreducible variety. For a quasi-projective algebraic set $T$, its algebraic dimension is the supremum of the lengths $r$ of strict chainsof nonempty irreducible closed subsets of $T$. It is the maximum of the algebraic dimensions of its irreducible components. On an affine algebraic set, the correspondence between irreducible closed subsets and prime ideals reverses inclusion, so this is the Krull dimension of the coordinate ring. On a quasi-projective algebraic set, it is the supremum of the Krull dimensions of the coordinate rings of its affine open subsets. At a closed point $x$, the Krull dimension of the local ring measures chains through $x$.

Here is a closed-point dimension lemma for affine domains that avoids transcendence degree. Put $A=k[X]$. By Noether normalization, there is a integral extensionThe number of variables is $d$ because integral extensions preserve Krull dimension and $\dim B=d$. For any maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ of $A$, its contraction $\mathfrak{n}$ to $B$ is a maximal ideal. Since $k$ is an algebraically closed field, $\mathfrak{n}=(z_1-c_1,\dots ,z_d-c_d)$ has height of a prime ideal $d$. The going-down theorem applies because $B$ is an integrally closed domain and $A$ is a integral domain. It lifts a length-$d$ chain below $\mathfrak{n}$ to one below $\mathfrak{m}$. HenceThe opposite inequality follows from $\dim A=d$.

For the nonempty open subset $U$, choose a nonempty principal open subset $D(g)\subset U$ and a closed point $x\in D(g)$. Every prime ideal below ${\mathfrak{m}}_x$ avoids $g$, so the preceding chain survives in the localization $A_g$. Consequently $\dim D(g)\ge d$. Conversely, any chain of irreducible closed subsets in $U$ gives a chain of the same length after taking closures in $X$: intersecting those closures with $U$ recovers the original subsets. Therefore

For the principal hypersurface dimension lemma, let $P$ be a minimal prime ideal over $(f)$. Since $f\ne 0$ in the integral domain $A$, $P\ne (0)$. The Krull principal ideal theorem gives $\mathrm{ht}P=1$. Choose a closed point $x$ on $V(P)$ lying on none of the other finitely many irreducible components of $V(f)$. Such a point exists because those other components cut out proper closed subsets of the irreducible variety $V(P)$, and closed points are dense. Set $R=A_{{\mathfrak{m}}_x}$. Then $\dim R=d$ andWrite $s=\dim R/fR$. Choose a system of parameters ${\bar{y}}_1,\dots ,{\bar{y}}_s$ in $R/fR$ and lift it to $R$. The ideal $(f,y_1,\dots ,y_s)$ has radical equal to the maximal ideal of $R$. The Krull height theorem yields $d\le s+1$. On the other hand, any chain of prime ideals containing $f$ can be extended strictly at the bottom by the zero prime ideal of the integral domain $R$, giving $s\le d-1$. Thus $s=d-1$. Since $R/PR$ is a localization of $A/P$, $\dim A/P\ge d-1$. Extending a chain in $A/P$ by $(0)⊊P$ also gives $\dim A/P\le d-1$. Hence every component has the required dimension:This argument uses Noether normalization, going-down theorem, and the Krull height theorem, never the dimension from the function field theorem. Irreducibility is essential: if the word variety were instead allowed to mean an arbitrary reducible affine algebraic set, neither assertion would hold without extra hypotheses. For example, a disjoint union of an affine plane and an affine line has an open component of smaller algebraic dimension; a function equal to $1$ on the plane and a coordinate on the line has a nonempty zero set of algebraic dimension $0$.