Conjugacy separable group Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-06
A group is conjugacy separable when any two nonconjugate elements remain nonconjugate in some finite quotient. Equivalently, every conjugacy class is closed in the profinite topology.
A Hausdorff, noncompact topology. The condition says precisely that each point of lies in a residue class contained in . These classes form a basis: the intersection of two classes containing a common point contains the class through that point with modulus equal to the least common multiple of their moduli. Thus arbitrary unions obey the condition, and so do finite intersections. Also and obey it. This is the profinite topology on .
If , choose . Then and are disjoint open neighbourhoods, proving the Hausdorff property. To test compactness, define
Every is nonempty and both open and closed: its complement is a finite union of other residue classes. Since , . If belonged to their intersection, then would be divisible by for every , forcing , impossible for an integer. Therefore is an increasing open cover of . Any finite subcollection has union for its largest index and misses the nonempty . This proves that the profinite topology on the integers is not compact.
Let be the inertia group and let denote Frobenius on the residue-field extension. The Relative Weil group is
Its Weil-group topology makes an open profinite group with its usual topology and gives the discrete topology. Thus every inertia coset is an open copy of .
Take , the maximal unramified extension of . Then
The subgroup is open in the discrete Weil-group topology, but it is not open in the profinite topology inherited from .
The profinite topology on has basis the residue classes , . These classes are both open and closed, since their complements are finite unions of other residue classes. Set for . Then and every is nonempty. An integer in their intersection would make divisible by every , forcing , impossible. Thus the open complements form an increasing cover with no finite subcover. The topology is Hausdorff because distinct integers are distinct modulo a sufficiently large integer, but is not compact.