J. G. Stavrianopoulos (RNase H researcher) 2026-11-05
J. G. Stavrianopoulos is the first author of a 1973 study purifying and characterizing calf-thymus Ribonuclease H. The investigators enriched the activity more than 3000-fold, then tested the preparation on defined RNA-DNA hybrids and on other RNA material. Activity required suitable metal ions, including magnesium or manganese under the reported conditions.[ref]
Purification and properties of ribonuclease H of calf thymus by J. G. Stavrianopoulos and others. Abstract: purification, activating ions and substrate tests; PNAS 70, 1959–1963, 1973
The preparation cleaved the tested RNA-DNA hybrids but did not attack ribosomal RNA. A negative substrate result is informative here: the name ribonuclease alone does not specify which molecular arrangement an enzyme recognizes. Comparing paired nucleic-acid substrates with an RNA preparation lacking the DNA partner helped characterize specificity rather than merely establishing that some cleavage occurred.[ref]
Purification and properties of ribonuclease H of calf thymus by J. G. Stavrianopoulos and others. Abstract: synthetic hybrid, phage-DNA/RNA hybrid and ribosomal-RNA negative result
Ribonuclease H 2026-11-05
Ribonuclease H cleaves the RNA component of an RNA-DNA hybrid, a paired structure containing one RNA strand and one DNA strand. Its substrate recognition therefore concerns both chemical composition and pairing, rather than merely the presence of RNA anywhere in a sample.[ref]
Ribonuclease H in IUBMB Enzyme Nomenclature. EC 3.1.26.4, endonucleolytic cleavage and hybrid substrate
A 1973 calf-thymus study purified the enzyme more than three thousandfold and tested several substrates. It cleaved an artificial DNA/RNA polymer pair and a hybrid made with phage DNA, while the tested ribosomal RNA was not attacked. Activity also required a suitable metal ion.[ref]
Purification and properties of ribonuclease H of calf thymus by J. G. Stavrianopoulos and others. Abstract, purification, substrates and metal-dependent activation
The comparison illustrates a specificity test. Detecting cleavage in one preparation would show activity, while testing alternative substrates helps establish what the activity recognizes. Conversely, failure to cleave a hybrid under conditions lacking an activating ion would not establish that the hybrid is intrinsically resistant. Protein purification, substrate controls and assay conditions jointly support the molecular interpretation; the behavior of one preparation should not be assumed to specify every member of the broader enzyme family.