Baer sum 2026-10-06
To add two extensions of by , take their direct sum, form a pullback in a category along the diagonal , and form a pushout in a category along addition . This produces another extension of by and defines addition in . In a quiver representation, vertexwise splittings express the two extensions by off-diagonal arrow matrices, and the Baer sum adds those matrices modulo the extension complex of quiver representations coboundaries.
For a reflexive pair with common section , form the pushout in a category of and , with maps . The equation , composed with , gives . This common map is a coequalizer of : every map equalizing them defines a commuting pair into the pushout and hence factors uniquely through .
Cokernel invariance under pushout 2026-10-06
In a pointed category, a pushout in a category of and induces an isomorphism between their categorical cokernels, when those cokernels exist. Push out the cokernel map of together with the zero map, then factor through the cokernel of . Cokernel and pushout uniqueness prove that this map is inverse to the induced comparison. No abelian hypothesis is needed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 18 8 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
In a pointed category, a zero object defines zero morphisms between all objects. A categorical cokernel of is a map with such that every with factors uniquely as . Equivalently it is the coequalizer of and the zero map, so is an epimorphism.
Write , , and for the vertical arrows, with and . The left pushout in a category applied to the compatible pair and gives satisfying and . The categorical cokernel property of then gives with .
Now . Cancel the epimorphism to obtain . To prove the other identity, the two arrows agree after , because , and after , because both composites are zero. The pushout in a category uniqueness clause gives . Cancelling the epimorphism gives .
Thus is an isomorphism: cokernel invariance under pushout holds already in pointed categories with the indicated cokernels.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 18 8 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let be the categorical cokernel of in an abelian category. If is an epimorphism, the equality implies . Since is also an epimorphism, implies . An object with zero identity is a zero object: every morphism to or from it is zero. Hence the cokernel object is zero.
Conversely, suppose the cokernel object is zero. If , additivity gives . The categorical cokernel property makes factor through the zero object, so and . ThusThis is the zero-cokernel criterion for epimorphisms. In a pushout in a category, the two horizontal morphisms have isomorphic cokernels by part (a). Therefore the lower morphism is epic if and only if the upper morphism is epic. In particular pushouts reflect epimorphisms in an abelian category; the same argument also proves preservation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 18 8 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the displayed square's notation , , , , with and epic. Form the biproduct and the morphismsThe map is an epimorphism, since its restriction to is : equality after implies equality after . The pullback in a category property says exactly that is a categorical kernel of . Indeed , and a map into killed by is a pair with , which factors uniquely through .
Use the standard abelian category property that every epimorphism is the categorical cokernel of its categorical kernel. If and satisfy , then . Hence there is a unique with . Restriction to the two summands gives and . This is the pushout in a category universal property. Thus a pullback of an epimorphism is a pushout in an abelian category.
In this pushout, is the pushout of along . The reflection result of part (b) therefore makes epic. This proves pullback stability of epimorphisms in an abelian category.
Finally, let be an epimorphism and let be its kernel pair. Their pullback square is a pushout by the result just proved. If satisfies , the two copies of form a pushout cocone. There is a unique with . Hence epimorphisms in an abelian category are coequalizers of their kernel pairs, so they are regular epimorphisms.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 119 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Assume (c), and take an epimorphism with a monofunctor. Since is a projective object in a category, there is a natural transformation with . A retract in a category of a monofunctor is a monofunctor: if , then naturality of gives , injectivity of gives , and applying gives . Thus (c) implies (b), completing
The stronger assertion that every set-valued functor is a monofunctor holds exactly when is a groupoid. Sufficiency follows because a functor preserves inverses, so sends every arrow to a bijection.
For necessity, fix , and form the pointwise pushout in a categoryusing twice the natural transformation given by precomposition with . At an object , consists of two copies of , with the two copies of identified for every . No different underlying elements are identified: each generating relation simply joins the two copies of one element. In , the two copies of coincide, since . Hence sends the two copies of in to the same element. If is a monofunctor, those copies of coincide. The description of the pushout implies for some . Thus every morphism is a split monomorphism.
Apply the same conclusion to : there is with . Then , and so as well. Every arrow is invertible, proving
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 119 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
A reflexive pair has a common section with . Form the pushout in a category of and , and write its two maps from as . Its relation , composed with , gives . Thus . Any with gives the compatible pair for this pushout and therefore factors uniquely through . This proves the coequalizer of a reflexive pair from a pushout construction.
There is a genuine transcription difference: the original PDF says finite products in the finite-colimit assertion, while the TeX says finite coproducts. The PDF assertion is false with products. Even retaining a pushout-existence assumption, the full subcategory of the Category of sets on nonempty sets has finite products, pushouts, and all coequalizers, but no initial object, hence no empty colimit. Regard the poset with elements , orderand incomparable as a category. It has finite meets and top , hence finite products in a category. Every reflexive pair in a poset is an equal pair and has its identity as a coequalizer. But have no least upper bound, so they have no coproduct in a category.
For the corrected construction using finite coproducts, let be a finite diagram in a category. PutDefine on the summand indexed by as and . Maps with are exactly cocone under a diagram data on . Hence their universal coequalizer is its colimit. Replace by the reflexive pairwhose common section is the second injection and whose coequalizer is unchanged. This proves construction of finite colimits from coproducts and reflexive coequalizers, including the empty diagram via the empty coproduct:
In an abelian category, suppose a commutative square is a pullback in a category and is an epimorphism. Then is the categorical kernel of the epimorphism . Since an epimorphism is the cokernel of its kernel, any compatible pair , induces a unique map by factoring . Hence the square is also a pushout in a category.
Universal property Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
A universal property characterizes an object by a prescribed family of morphisms and a unique factorization of every competing family. It determines that object up to a unique compatible isomorphism. Examples include the pushout in a category and the universal property of the tensor product of modules.