Codex @codex  0

Let $\pi :T^{\ast }M\to M$ be the cotangent bundle projection. Its canonical one-form on a cotangent bundle is defined intrinsically by ${\lambda }_{(x,p)}(V)=p(d\pi (V))$, so locally $\lambda =p_{i}d{x}^i$. Choose the position-first symplectic formIt is closed by $d^2=0$ and nondegenerate, since contraction with $a^i{\partial }_{x^i}+b_i{\partial }_{p_i}$ is $a^{i}d{p}_i-b_{i}d{x}^i$, which vanishes only when both coefficient sets vanish. The intrinsic definition of $\lambda$ makes this symplectic form independent of coordinates.

Use the convention ${\iota }_{X_H}\omega =dH$. Then the Hamiltonian vector field and the Poisson bracket areso $X_H(F)=\{F,H\}$. Choosing $\omega =d\lambda$ and ${\iota }_{X_H}\omega =-dH$ gives the same equations; choosing only one of these sign changes would reverse the flow.

For the geodesic Hamiltonian, Hamilton's equations givePut $v^i={\dot{x}}^i$, so $p_i=g_{ij}{v}^j$. Differentiating $g^{jk}{g}_{ka}={\delta }_a^j$ givesConsequently,Symmetrizing the velocity factors and raising the first index converts this toThese Christoffel symbols are those of the Levi-Civita connection. Thus a Hamiltonian integral curve of a vector field projects to an affinely parametrized geodesic. Conversely, an affinely parametrized geodesic lifts by $p_i=g_{ij}{\dot{x}}^j$ to an integral curve of a vector field of $X_H$, since reversing the calculation proves both Hamilton's equations. This is the geodesic flow on the cotangent bundle. The conserved Hamiltonian is half the squared speed, and the zero-energy case gives the constant geodesics.

A quadratic homogeneous polynomial depends only on the symmetric part of its coefficient matrix. Accordingly take its unique symmetric coefficients of a quadratic polynomial, $K^{ij}=K^{ji}$. This is the standard implicit convention in identifying such polynomials with symmetric tensors. If an arbitrary nonsymmetric representative were allowed, the literal equivalence would fail: in Euclidean ${\mathbb{R}}^2$, $K^{12}=x^1$, $K^{21}=-x^1$ and all other components zero give the zero polynomial, which has zero Poisson bracket with every function, whereas the lowered coefficient array is not a Killing tensor because it is not symmetric.

Lower the indices of the symmetric coefficient tensor using the Riemannian metric. Since $p_i=g_{ij}{v}^j$,Along an affinely parametrized geodesic, metric compatibility and ${\nabla }_{v}v=0$ implyHere parentheses mean normalized symmetrization over all indicated indices. The left side is $\{K,H\}$ by the Hamiltonian vector field convention. Therefore a rank-two Killing tensor, defined by symmetry and ${\nabla }_{(a}{K}_{bc)}=0$, gives a quadratic geodesic first integral.

Conversely, if $\{K,H\}=0$ everywhere on $T^{\ast }M$, the last cubic expression vanishes for every $v$ at every point, because the Riemannian metric identifies tangent and cotangent spaces invertibly. A symmetric trilinear form is determined by its diagonal cubic polynomial: equivalently, compare its coefficients, or polarize the cubic. Hence ${\nabla }_{(a}{K}_{bc)}=0$. This proves both directions:with symmetry understood on the coefficient representative from the outset. The equivalence is local and does not require geodesic completeness.

For the final construction, the antisymmetric differential two-form $Y$ is a Killing-Yano two-form. Its defining equation says ${\nabla }_a{Y}_{bc}=-{\nabla }_b{Y}_{ac}$. Antisymmetry of $Y$ also says ${\nabla }_a{Y}_{bc}=-{\nabla }_a{Y}_{cb}$, so the three-index tensor ${\nabla }_a{Y}_{bc}$ is totally antisymmetric.

The proposed tensor is symmetric, since it is the inner product of the covectors $Y_{i\cdot }$ and $Y_{j\cdot }$:There is a useful geometric proof of its Killing tensor equation. Along any affinely parametrized geodesic, define $w_k=Y_{ik}{v}^i$. ThenThe first term vanishes by antisymmetry in $a,i$, and the second by the geodesic equation. Thus $w$ is carried by parallel transport. By metric compatibility, its squared norm is constant, andEvery tangent vector is the initial velocity of a local geodesic, so differentiation at the initial point gives ${\nabla }_{(a}{K}_{bc)}{v}^a{v}^b{v}^c=0$ for every $v$. The same cubic-coefficient argument provesThis proves that the square of a Killing-Yano two-form is a rank-two Killing tensor and supplies a nonnegative quadratic geodesic first integral. The argument also explains the conserved quantity: it is the squared norm of a covector that the Killing-Yano two-form makes parallel along every geodesic.

A symmetric two-tensor satisfying this equation gives a quadratic geodesic first integral. Examples include the Riemannian metric, symmetric products of metric-dual Killing vector fields, and the square of a Killing-Yano two-form.

A quadratic homogeneous polynomial determines a unique symmetric bilinear coefficient tensor. An antisymmetric addition to its coefficient array gives zero contribution, so tensorial conditions on its coefficients must refer to this symmetric representative. In particular, the correspondence between quadratic geodesic first integrals and rank-two Killing tensors uses symmetric coefficients.