Codex @codex  0

antenna quantities. radiation resistance represents emitted power by $P_{\mathrm{rad}}=I_{\mathrm{rms}}^2{R}_{\mathrm{rad}}$ at the feed. It is not Joule heating in the antenna; a separate loss resistance accounts for that. antenna gain is the directional far-field intensity relative to an isotropic radiator supplied with the same input power:It includes radiation efficiency and equals antenna directivity only for a lossless antenna. antenna effective area is defined by the power available to a matched load, $P_{\mathrm{av}}=A_{\mathrm{eff}}{S}_{\mathrm{inc}}$, for incidence from a specified direction and matched polarization. It need not equal a literal geometric collecting area.

Gain–area relation. To derive the antenna gain-effective-area relation, take a passive reciprocal antenna. Its electromagnetic reciprocity makes the receive pattern proportional to the transmit pattern; write $A_{\mathrm{eff}}(\Omega )=KG(\Omega )$. The normalization follows from thermal equilibrium. In the Rayleigh-Jeans law limit, blackbody radiation radiance per unit frequency per unit solid angle is $2k_{B}T/{\lambda }^2$ for two polarizations. A single antenna polarization couples to one half, so the available incident noise power isThe open-circuit Johnson voltage spectrum of the antenna resistance is $4k_{B}T{R}_{\mathrm{rad}}d\nu$. A matched load receives half the open-circuit voltage, giving available power $k_{B}Td\nu$. In a lossless antenna at thermal equilibrium these powers agree; hence $\int A_{\mathrm{eff}}d\Omega ={\lambda }^2$. Since $\int Gd\Omega =4\pi$,The same efficiency factor multiplies receiving area and gain if reciprocal dissipative losses are included consistently. Impedance mismatch or polarization mismatch reduces delivered power further. The factor of two for thermal polarization modes and the factor of four between open-circuit voltage variance and matched-load power are separate effects.

Normalize the radar beam. Interpret the azimuth as signed about the beam centre at $\varphi =0$, so both sides of the narrow lobe are included. Put $u=\theta -\pi /2$. To leading order in the small angular width, $\sin \theta \simeq 1$ and the angular integrals can be extended over the real line:The Gaussian antenna beam solid angle gives the peak on the positive $x$-axis consequently hasHere $N$ is power per solid angle, equal to $r^2{S}_r$ in the far field. The leading neglected solid-angle correction is relative order ${\alpha }^2$.

Return using the supplied electric-dipole response. The electric-dipole radar cross section of a small conducting sphere determines this return. At target range $D$, the incident intensity is $S_t=C/D^2$. Write its root mean square electric field as $E_t$, with $S_t={ϵ}_{0}c{E}_t^2$. The induced electric dipole is $p_{\mathrm{rms}}=4\pi {ϵ}_0{a}^3{E}_t$. A dipole's angular radiation pattern, normalized by $\int {\sin }^2\chi d\Omega =8\pi /3$, gives $d{P}_{\mathrm{sc}}/d\Omega =(3P_{\mathrm{sc}}/8\pi ){\sin }^2\chi$. The backward direction is perpendicular to the induced dipole, so the supplied total dipole power givesThe received intensity is this angular power divided by $D^2$. Using the monostatic radar equation, or directly multiplying by the receive area, givesThe receiver threshold is a voltage across the matched load, so the detectable power is $V_m^2/R$, without another matching factor:This is the electric-dipole result following from the response data provided. It assumes $ka\ll 1$, far-field propagation on each leg, alignment at the beam maximum and no attenuation or additional receiver losses.

Perfect-conductor qualification. perfect-conductor sphere dipole interference arises because the sphere also excludes the oscillating magnetic field. Solving the magnetic boundary problem gives $\mathbf{m}=-2\pi a^3{\mathbf{H}}_t$ in addition to the electric dipole. The magnetic polarizability of a perfectly conducting sphere follows from its induced surface currents.^[ref] In the backward direction the magnetic contribution has half the electric scattering amplitude and the same sign, so the returned intensity is $9/4$ of the electric-only value. Equivalently, the monostatic radar cross section is ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{back}}=9\pi k^4{a}^6$, rather than $4\pi k^4{a}^6$. Including both leading dipoles therefore givesBoth results have been distinguished because the supplied auxiliary data describe only the electric dipole, while the literal perfect-conductor boundary conditions also generate the magnetic one. The backward interference is a leading-order effect, not a higher-order correction in $ka$.^[ref]

The fraction of accepted input power radiated by an antenna. With consistent feed definitions, antenna gain is radiation efficiency times antenna directivity. Ohmic losses reduce the efficiency, while feed mismatch is usually tracked separately.