Exponential forcing response with zero initial data Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-10-25
For pairwise distinct rates , the response is
Set . Solving with gives ; solving the remaining first-order equation by an integrating factor gives the formula. Equivalently this is the convolution of with the zero-displacement unit-impulse response on the positive half-line. In the resonant case , the finite limit is . The apparent singularity of the distinct-rate expression is removable, and the limit exhibits the polynomial factor of a resonant exponential particular solution.
The complementary solution comes from the characteristic equation , whose roots are . It is therefore
For the resonant exponential particular solution, the forcing is already a homogeneous exponential, so the method of undetermined coefficients needs the resonant trial . If , the identity when gives . Hence and
The decay condition first eliminates the growing exponential, . A nonzero combination of the sine and cosine has a fixed nonzero amplitude and cannot tend to zero, so as well. Both remaining exponential terms decay because . Finally , giving the unique answer
This is an instance of resonance in a differential equation: multiplication by supplies the particular solution when the forcing exponent is a simple characteristic root.
The characteristic equation is , giving the complementary function . For the forcing term , a linear particular solution gives , hence , .
The forcing gives resonance in a differential equation, since already appears in the complementary function. Try . Direct differentiation gives
so . Combining the two particular solutions gives
The factor in the resonant exponential particular solution is required because is already a root of the characteristic equation.
Now the characteristic equation is , with a repeated root, so the complementary function is . For the polynomial forcing, substitute to obtain
Thus , , . For the forcing , both and already occur in the complementary function; the resonant exponential particular solution therefore starts with . The identity
gives . The resulting general solution is
Now , so the forcing coincides with a homogeneous exponential and requires a resonant exponential particular solution. With as above, and give . Therefore
Integrating from zero yields
Its numerator starts at order , ensuring both initial conditions. It is also the finite coalescing-rate limit of the nonresonant exponential forcing response with zero initial data.
The characteristic polynomial of the homogeneous equation is . Thus the complementary function is . The forcing resonates with the first term, so a resonant exponential particular solution is . Substitution gives , hence .
The full solution is . At zero, the two initial conditions give and . Solving yields , , so
The one-sided Laplace transform is for sufficiently large . Integration by parts, with the exponential suppressing the upper boundary, gives
Differentiation under the integral gives , proving . Start with and apply this rule repeatedly:
With all three initial data zero, transforming the forced equation gives . Thus and the listed inverse transform gives
The cubic factor is also the resonant exponential particular solution associated with the triple characteristic root .
Resonance in a differential equation Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-11-05
In a linear differential equation, resonance in a differential equation occurs when the forcing belongs to a mode annihilated by the homogeneous operator, so an ordinary trial of the same shape cannot be inverted. For with , a polynomial factor in supplies a resonant exponential particular solution. The root multiplicity determines the required power.
For , is a particular solution. Direct differentiation gives . By contrast, the resonant equation has , which still decays: resonance enhances a mode relative to its natural exponential, without always causing an unbounded physical response. Under logarithmic coordinates in a Cauchy-Euler equation, polynomial factors in transformed time become logarithms of .