Abel theorem for divisors 2026-10-14
A degree-zero complex analytic divisor on a compact Riemann surface is principal exactly when its Abel-Jacobi map of a compact Riemann surface is zero. Normalize a differential of the third kind with residues equal to the coefficients of . The Riemann bilinear relations for a compact surface express its -periods as times the Abel integrals. If those integrals are in the period lattice, subtract a suitable integral multiple of the normalized holomorphic differential forms; all periods then lie in , so exponentiation gives the required meromorphic function. Conversely, the logarithmic differential of a meromorphic function has integer residues and periods in , giving a zero Abel class by the same calculation.
Let , of complex dimension , and choose a symplectic basis of , with . Integration gives a homomorphism
We first prove both injectivity and discreteness, rather than treating periods as a lattice by definition.
Cut the compact Riemann surface along this basis to a polygon. For closed one-forms , choose a primitive of on the cut polygon and apply Stokes theorem to . Pairing its boundary edges records the jumps of across the cuts and gives the Riemann bilinear relations for a compact surface:
If a holomorphic differential form has all -periods zero, take . The right side is zero, while in a holomorphic coordinate, for ,
Its integral is strictly positive unless . Thus the -period map is injective, hence an isomorphism. Choose a basis with , and put . Applying the same boundary identity to , whose wedge product is zero, gives . Applying it to and its conjugate gives
Hence is positive definite.
In the dual coordinates, . The real-linear map from to is an isomorphism: taking imaginary parts of a zero gives , then and . Its image of is therefore discrete and cocompact, and no nonzero integral cycle has zero image. Thus
The Abel-Jacobi map of a compact Riemann surface sends an effective complex analytic divisor to modulo . Changing a path adds an integral period, so the map is well-defined. For two degree- complex analytic divisors, let , with , and put
We prove that is principal exactly when , including the construction of a meromorphic function.
First construct a differential of the third kind with residues at the support of and no other poles. For the reduced support , the residue exact sequence is
On sheaf cohomology, the obstruction to prescribing residues belongs to by Serre duality; its pairing with the constant section of is the sum of residues. This follows directly by integrating the local simple-pole terms around the boundary circles. Thus the obstruction is zero because , and the required exists. Subtract a linear combination of the normalized holomorphic differential forms so that all its -periods are zero.
Take its poles and the integration paths inside the same cut polygon. Apply the boundary calculation above to a primitive , removing small circles around the poles of . Since away from the poles, the paired outer edges contribute , while the small circles contribute by the residue theorem. Therefore
The same argument without normalizing gives the useful reciprocity identity
These identities use compatible cuts and paths; the final conclusions are unchanged by integral periods.
Suppose with . Define
Its -periods are , and its -periods are . Around a pole its integral is . These cycles generate the first homology group of the punctured surface, so every period of belongs to . Choosing an auxiliary point away from the poles, set
It is single-valued away from the poles. Locally , so times a nonvanishing holomorphic function. It extends meromorphically with . This proves sufficiency and explicitly produces the required principal complex analytic divisor.
Conversely, if , the meromorphic differential has residues and every period in , since each integral counts the winding number of about zero. Write its -period vector as and its -period vector as , with . The reciprocity identity gives . Since has degree zero, changing the base point cancels in its Abel sum; a base point at the support of causes no problem, because the Abel integrals use holomorphic forms. We have proved
This establishes the Abel theorem for divisors directly from the period and residue calculations.