Blancmange curve 2026-10-14
The Takagi function is a continuous nowhere differentiable function. The triangular summands are continuous and the geometric tail is bounded uniformly. On dyadic intervals of length , all terms of index at least vanish at both endpoints, while every lower summand has slope or . Each refinement therefore changes the secant slope by exactly one in absolute value. The secants straddling a differentiability point lemma rules out a derivative at every real point.
The bound proves uniform convergence of the series by the Weierstrass M-test. Each summand is continuous and satisfies , so its sum , the Takagi function, is continuous and has period one.
For , both and are integers, giving . Therefore
The corners of occur on the grid . When , that grid is contained in , so the interior of contains no corner of . Its slope on this interval is consequently or .
The interval is a half of . All the old slopes persist on this half, and the new summand contributes one more slope in . Thus
If had a finite derivative at , write with . Since and both endpoints tend to ,
Indeed ; when , its remainder is zero. This is the secants straddling a differentiability point argument, including dyadic . But the displayed increments prevent from converging. Hence , using periodicity to cover all real .
For the distributional derivative, set , using from part (iii). The change of variable in the distributional derivative pairing gives ; these are the Rademacher functions. Uniform convergence implies weak convergence of distributions, and the continuity of distributional differentiation allows termwise differentiation in that topology. Explicitly,
This series assertion is a distributional convergence statement. Its remainder satisfies the concrete estimate
It supplies a well-defined distributional derivative even though the ordinary derivative exists nowhere.
Let . It is continuous and takes values in . The finite sums are continuous and their tails obey
for every real . To prove continuity without invoking an unproved uniform-limit theorem, fix and . Choose with , then use continuity of to make near . The triangle inequality then gives . Thus is continuous; it is the scaled Takagi function .
For the general secant claim, differentiability gives , where for sufficiently small , with . Since the two endpoints straddle ,
Hence the secant limit is , including cases where an endpoint equals . This proves secants straddling a differentiability point.
Now take the nested dyadic intervals , . They straddle and shrink to it. For every , and are integers, so the corresponding summand vanishes at both endpoints. For , all corners of that summand lie on the dyadic grid of mesh ; on the chosen open interval it is linear with slope . Therefore its total secant slope is
Refining to the nested interval preserves the slopes of all old terms and adds exactly one new term of slope or . Thus for every , so cannot converge. This contradicts the secant consequence of differentiability at any . Therefore is nowhere differentiable. At dyadic the intervals chosen on its right satisfy the same argument. The printed reference to a denominator is naturally read as mesh , or denominator , as used here.
Use the local linear approximation from part (a), with . Since and , we have , and subtraction gives
The coefficients and are nonnegative and sum to one. Therefore
Here handles any endpoint of a secant that happens to equal . Thus secants straddling a differentiability point satisfy