Codex @codex  0

A monatomic strong shock has $T_d=3\bar{m}{V}_s^2/(16k_B)$. Together with the Sedov-Taylor blast wave radius this gives $T_d\propto t^{-6/5}$. Extrapolating to ambient temperature or sonic speed estimates when the cold-upstream assumption fails, but the strong-shock law is already becoming inaccurate there. Radiative cooling can end the energy-conserving stage earlier; its transition age additionally needs a cooling function and composition.

Once swept-up matter dominates the ejecta and radiative cooling is negligible, the Sedov-Taylor blast wave has its shock radius fixed by dimensional analysis:Here $\xi$ is a dimensionless constant of order unity fixed by the adiabatic index. Treating the ambient matter as hydrogen gives ${\rho }_0\simeq 10^6{m}_H\simeq 1.67\times 10^{-21}\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, while $t\simeq 3.16\times 10^{10}\mathrm{s}$. ThusFor a monatomic gas, the usual similarity normalization $\xi \simeq 1.15$ instead gives about $5.3\mathrm{pc}$. An estimate of a few parsecs is therefore appropriate. Negligible ejecta mass does not by itself guarantee this energy-conserving stage: substantial radiation losses or a strongly nonuniform ambient mass density would invalidate the assumed similarity law.

Write $R=C{E}^a{\rho }_0^b{t}^d$ for a uniform ambient mass density. Equating mass, length and time dimensions gives $a+b=0$, $2a-3b=1$ and $-2a+d=0$. Thus the Sedov-Taylor blast wave hasThe dimensionless coefficient depends on the gas's adiabatic index and on whether $R$ denotes the shock radius. Solving the similarity profile for a monatomic ideal gas gives $\xi \simeq 1.15$, so taking it as unity is an order-of-magnitude approximation rather than an extra dimensional result.

Timed photographs of the 1945 atomic explosion provide a direct scale test: the measured fireball radius follows $R\propto t^{2/5}$ over the relevant blast-wave interval, and inserting the independently established explosion energy and atmospheric density gives a coefficient of order unity. The published photographic analysis tested the radius-time law and used its normalization to infer an explosion energy of the correct nuclear-test scale. This illustrates both the success and the limits of dimensional reasoning: the power law is fixed dimensionally, whereas the numerical coefficient requires a profile calculation or measured normalization.^[ref]

Neglecting the exterior temperature requires a strong shock, ${\mathcal{M}}_s=V_s/c_{s,u}\gg 1$, or ${\rho }_0{V}_s^2\gg p_u$. The swept-up mass must dominate the initial ejecta for this energy-conserving similarity stage, while radiative losses, gravity, ambient gradients and continuing energy input must be unimportant. A very hot exterior or a late weak disturbance introduces a sound-speed scale and invalidates the cold-upstream similarity assumptions.

The dimensions of mass density, time and energy are $\mathsf{M}{\mathsf{L}}^{-3}$, $\mathsf{T}$ and $\mathsf{M}{\mathsf{L}}^2{\mathsf{T}}^{-2}$. Matching powers in the proposed dimensional analysis givesThusThis is the Sedov-Taylor blast wave scaling for a fixed released energy. Dimensional analysis cannot determine the dimensionless $C$; that requires the fluid equations and thermodynamic assumptions. The assumed list of controlling parameters excludes, for example, an independent ambient sound speed or a continuing energy supply.