Write , positive on opening. The no-slip boundary condition equates the fluid velocity with each plate's velocity:
The upper condition is a moving-wall no-penetration boundary condition, not zero normal velocity in the laboratory frame. At the hinge the velocity tends to zero. With the arbitrary constant of the streamfunction chosen so that , these conditions become
A changing angle cannot give a literally steady flow in fixed coordinates. We interpret the stated steadiness as the quasi-steady Stokes approximation at each instantaneous .
The printed expression is not biharmonic. To test it without reproducing the source formula, write its bracket as and its streamfunction as . For any angular function , the Laplacian gives
At the concrete angle , differentiation of the printed bracket gives
For example, at the interior point ,
The printed bracket does satisfy and , so its boundary velocities would require . Satisfying these boundary conditions does not cure its nonzero biharmonic operator. The stated series is likewise not a general biharmonic basis: its term already fails the displayed test. The separated polar solutions of the biharmonic equation contain additional radial powers; for the required dependence, the angular basis is .
The corrected slowly opening Stokes wedge similarity solution follows by setting . The biharmonic equation gives . The two lower-wall conditions reduce its general solution to
The upper-wall condition fixes the ratio of and , and fixes their scale. An expression that also remains finite at is
For , its denominator is positive: the derivative of is . Direct differentiation verifies all four boundary conditions and the biharmonic equation. The resulting velocity components are and .
For a fixed angle of order one, , so the local Reynolds number is . One breakdown length is therefore
A second is the geometric length , where is the distance to the radial ends and the spanwise width. At , matching to the surrounding bath or three-dimensional end flow matters. Thus is required for this local two-dimensional Stokes flow, with angle-dependent factors in the inertial estimate. Ideal infinite plates remove the geometric cutoff but not the inertial one.
There is also a temporal restriction: the relevant viscous diffusion time must be short compared with the time over which the shape and its velocity field change appreciably. Using as a conservative diffusion length gives . For order-one angles and constant , gives the same scale as ; narrow angles require using their actual gap and angular factors rather than extrapolating this order-one-angle estimate.