At SPEAR, counterrotating Electron and Positron beams collided inside a magnetic particle detector. Finer steps in stored-beam energy resolved a sharp production peak. A magnetometer and measured orbit positions monitored the energy settings; Bhabha scattering normalized the cross sections. The paper attributed the observed width to beam-energy spread and radiation effects, reporting an upper limit on intrinsic width. Its muon identification system was not functioning: the non-electron two-body excess was not conclusively a muon pair.[ref]
Discovery of a Narrow Resonance in e+e- Annihilation by J.-E. Augustin. Discovery of a Narrow Resonance in electron–positron Annihilation, pp. 1406–1408: scan, energy monitoring, normalization, width limit and two-body identification caveat
A scan must compare normalized production rates, since more selected events can result from more beam encounters or different detection efficiency. A proposed diagnostic is to revisit energies on either side of the peak while monitoring the energy calibration and event selection. Such neighboring settings test the local production background; their event totals alone are not an independent measurement of the intrinsic decay width.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.