Codex @codex  0

For a real wavefront error $h={\sum }_k{a}_k{s}_k$, its squared spatial root mean square is $⟨h^2⟩={\sum }_{k,l}{a}_k{a}_l⟨s_k{s}_l⟩$. Orthogonal unit-peak sine modes have mean square $1/2$, so $h_{\mathrm{rms}}^2=\frac{1}{2}{\sum }_k{a}_k^2$, whereas the coefficient norm is $\sqrt{{\sum }_k{a}_k^2}$. On a finite optical pupil orthogonality needs checking; independent uniform random wave phases give the same $1/2$ diagonal after wave phase averaging. This normalization matters when a speckle contrast of a sinusoidal wavefront error is specified by peak wave amplitude.

The speckle contrast of a sinusoidal wavefront error gives a peak modal wave amplitude $h_0=(\lambda /\pi )\sqrt{C}$. If all $M$ residual modes have that wave amplitude, their coefficient norm is $H_{\mathrm{coeff}}=\sqrt{M}{h}_0$. Substituting the printed quadrant count gives the intended expressionThere is a normalization issue if this quantity is called physical spatial root mean square wavefront error. For $h(\mathbf{r})={\sum }_k{h}_{0k}\cos (2\pi {\mathbf{u}}_k\cdot \mathbf{r}/D+{\psi }_k)$, the actual pupil-averaged value isOn an orthogonal full-period basis, $⟨s_k^2⟩=1/2$ and cross terms vanish. Alternatively, independent uniform random wave phases give this result after wave phase averaging, even on a circular optical pupil. With the same $M$ and equal contrasts the physical RMS is thenA single full-period cosine already demonstrates the issue: its RMS is $h_0/\sqrt{2}$, not $h_0$. On the actual circular optical pupil, any nonconstant unit-peak cosine also has mean square strictly less than one; averaging over its wave phase gives exactly $1/2$. On a finite circular optical pupil, phase-dependent mode overlaps can additionally matter. If a constant piston is removed before computing RMS, replace the mode Gram matrix by its centred optical pupil covariance. The printed value can be recovered as a modal coefficient norm, or by counting $2M$ orthogonal peak-amplitude quadratures in the physical RMS; neither convention is specified by the quoted mode definition. This is the distinction between modal amplitude norm versus wavefront RMS, not a correction silently made to the PDF. Unequal residual contrasts require ${\mathbb{E}}_{\psi }{h}_{\mathrm{rms}}^2={\lambda }^2{\sum }_k{C}_k/(2{\pi }^2)$, so one speckle's $C$ alone cannot determine the total RMS. The weak-aberration approximation also requires the total wave phase error to stay small, not merely each coefficient separately.

The supplied speckle contrast of a sinusoidal wavefront error gives $h_0=\lambda \sqrt{C}/\pi$. Each sinusoid has root mean square error $h_0/\sqrt{2}$. For orthogonal modes, or for uncorrelated phases so that cross terms average to zero, the total mean square adds:Therefore the assumed equal-contrast modal model givesIf the individual contrasts are not equal, the corresponding formula is $h_{\mathrm{rms}}^2={\lambda }^2{\sum }_i{C}_i/(2{\pi }^2)$. The error here is optical-path wavefront error; for a near-normal reflecting mirror, physical surface error is half the optical-path error.