Spectral shift in an adjoint weak formulation ($B^{\ast }[u,v]-\lambda (u,v)=(f,v)$)

The weak form of $(L^{\ast }-\lambda )u=f$ includes the same scalar shift as the differential equation. The unshifted identity $B^{\ast }[u,v]=(f,v)$ instead represents $L^{\ast }u=f$ and cannot imply the shifted equation for nonzero $\lambda$ unless $u=0$. On a smooth bounded domain choose any nonzero compactly supported smooth $u$ and take $L=-\Delta +1$, $f=Lu$ for a direct counterexample. For constant drift coefficients, integration by parts reverses the drift sign in $L^{\ast }$ without changing this spectral term.