Let be a group-specific conditional probability in stratum , and let with . Average each group's conditional probabilities using the same weights. Then
This is a descriptive comparison under a common covariate composition. Its difference from a crude contrast need not be a causal effect. Causal outcome standardization additionally requires its identification assumptions.
Suppose group has stratum weights summing to one and conditional means . Write and . The crude difference has the displayed decomposition. Expanding the two products in each stratum cancels the cross terms and leaves , proving the identity. The first term uses common average-group weights; the second records a composition difference. Neither term alone identifies a causal pathway.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.