Discrepancy theory 2026-11-05
Discrepancy theory measures how evenly a finite configuration or coloring can satisfy many constraints at once. For a finite set and a family of subsets, its two-color discrepancy isThe sum is the difference between the two color counts in . A single balanced total does not guarantee small discrepancy on every constrained subset.
If and contains all contiguous intervals, alternating the colors gives discrepancy at most one: each even-length interval has equal counts, and each odd-length interval differs by one. Singleton constraints show that one is optimal. More complicated overlapping families can force much larger imbalance.
A related geometric formulation compares point counts in test regions with their expected volume. Star discrepancy uses boxes anchored at the origin. Such bounds quantify how well a deterministic point set approximates uniform integration, linking combinatorics with numerical integration.
Erdős-Turán inequality Created 2026-10-13 Updated 2026-11-05
The Erdős-Turán inequality bounds how unevenly finitely many points fill the half-open interval by measuring finitely many Fourier modes. For define their normalized star discrepancy byThere is a universal constant such that, for every positive integer ,The finite-point form follows from the corresponding probability measure inequality by placing mass at each point of the unit circle represented by .[ref]
One more proof of the Erdős-Turán inequality, and an error estimate in Wigner's law by Ohad N. Feldheim and Sasha Sodin. Proposition 1, equation (1), printed p. 1; rescale the circle coordinate by and use the empirical probability measure
The cutoff trades an approximation error against the measured exponential sums. If each fixed nonzero Fourier mode tends to zero as grows, take the limit superior first with fixed, then let grow. This gives , the quantitative route to equidistribution.
For the grid with , every displayed exponential sum vanishes for by the finite geometric series. Choosing yields ; direct counting gives the sharper exact value .
Star discrepancy 2026-11-05
For points in , star discrepancy compares their empirical frequencies in anchored boxes with Lebesgue measure:The half-open box convention makes boundary membership precise. Small star discrepancy means that every such box contains nearly its uniform share of points; it does not mean the points are independent random samples.
In one dimension, take midpoint points . Between consecutive points, the empirical count is constant while the interval length increases linearly. Just before or after a point the largest difference is , so . Repeating a single point instead leaves large gaps and large discrepancy. The definition directly controls the integration error for indicators of anchored boxes and motivates deterministic sampling for numerical integration.