A renewal process counts arrivals , where and the holding times are independent, identically distributed positive random variables. Their sum tends to infinity almost surely, so the count is finite on bounded time intervals. Use in the question's notation. The index is a stopping index for the holding-time sequence. Conditional on and the first holding times, every later retains its original probability distribution. Summing over proves
The straddling time is different. Let and let be the renewal measure . Independence of the next holding time from its start gives
For two numbers in , their minimum is at least their product. Since , subtracting times the second integral proves
These formulae handle holding-time atoms with the stated renewal convention ; sums may be interchanged by nonnegativity.
For rate- exponentials, the renewal process is Poisson. The elapsed age has probability distribution with : for , is the probability of no arrivals in , namely , with an atom at . The forward residual is an independent rate- exponential by independent future increments. Thus . Conditioning on the age gives the exact survival law
For the extra term is strictly positive, proving strict inequality. For fixed and , the limit is , which equals the survival probability of the sum of two independent rate- exponentials. This is the finite-time form of the stochastic length bias of a renewal interval.
Let be the distribution function of , write , and fix . Set
Conditioning on the first interarrival gives
Indeed, if , the first interval contains and must also have length at least ; if , the process starts afresh at time .
Put and . Then
where
In particular . Iterating the renewal equation yields
For fixed , the last term tends to zero in absolute value because is bounded and
It follows that
Thus the stochastic length bias of a renewal interval gives
for every .