Closed local operator Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
For a subterminal object classified by , the closed local operator is . Its closed monos contain the pullback of that subterminal, hence are exactly the monos dense for the corresponding open local operator.
Open local operator 2026-10-06
For a subterminal object classified by , the open local operator is . Its dense monos are exactly those whose image contains the pullback of that subterminal. It is complementary to the corresponding closed local operator.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 24 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A local operator is an inflationary, idempotent, finite-meet-preserving map with , expressed in the internal logic of a topos. For a subterminal object with truth value , the closed local operator and quasi-closed local operator are respectivelyThe first is a local operator by distributivity. For the second put . Then , is order-reversing, and : the first inequality gives , while its application to gives the reverse inequality. Thus is inflationary and idempotent, and .
For meet preservation, monotonicity gives . Conversely put . From and , we obtain . Intersecting with gives , hence . This proves all local-operator axioms. Also and . Equivalently, it is the largest local operator leaving fixed: if , thenThis explains the quasi-closed terminology as relative double negation above the closed bottom .
The subobject classifier of is the closed-subobject classifier . Its bottom is , its meet is inherited, its join is , and implication between closed truth values is the ambient implication. To verify the last claim, if , thenIt follows that ; inflationarity gives equality and also .
Suppose . Every closed lies above , and its complement in is , also closed because . We have . Moreover , so . Thus the fixed truth values form a Boolean algebra, and the sheaf topos is a Boolean topos.
Conversely suppose the sheaf topos is Boolean and put . Complementation in its classifier is . Applying the double-complement identity to , and using the implication calculation above, givesTherefore
For the cover, work in the slice category . Its generic subterminal object is . Form its quasi-closed Boolean subtopos , and compose its embedding with the slice projection to obtain . The slice projection has inverse image , and sheafification is left exact, so this is a geometric morphism.
To prove surjectivity, take a monomorphism with characteristic predicate , and suppose makes it invertible. Pullback to the slice followed by sheafification makes this exactly the assertion that it is -dense. Internally on , therefore,for the generic truth value . Substitute by pulling back along the graph . The left side becomes , so and the original mono is invertible. Thus reflects invertible monos. If it identifies two parallel arrows, their equalizer becomes invertible; reflection then shows the arrows were already equal. Hence is faithful, andThe generic truth value is essential: substituting only a fixed global value such as would give a Boolean subtopos, but need not give a surjection onto the original topos.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 24 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Work internally with the Heyting algebra and the truth value of . For , the identitiesprove that it is an open local operator.
For a monomorphism with characteristic map , density means , equivalently . This says exactly that is contained in , or that the pullback mono is invertible. Consequently
An object is an -sheaf exactly when the canonical map , taking a value to its constant function on , is invertible. Indeed is dense for every . The sheaf condition makes bijective for every , which proves invertible by the Yoneda lemma. Conversely, if is invertible and is dense, the isomorphism givesso is a sheaf.
The pullback functor has right adjoint , sending to . Every map is automatically over , since is subterminal object, proving this adjunction directly. Its counit is evaluation and is invertible. The inverse sends to its image in together with the constant function of value ; all elements of agree, so the composites are identities. The right adjoint is therefore full and faithful, and its image consists of objects fixed by . The sheaf characterization above proves
For a general local operator , its dense monomorphism classifier is the ordered subobjectA mono is j-dense exactly when its characteristic map factors through . If , then , which has least element . This is least internally over every parameter object, not just among global points.
Conversely suppose a global is internally least. Upward closure of gives exactly when , in every context. For let be its -closure, with characteristic predicate . The mono is dense: restricting to gives truth. Its characteristic map therefore lands in , so leastness of gives . Internally this isOn the other hand , and applying to gives . Inflationarity then gives . Both inequalities yieldThis proves the least dense truth characterizes an open local operator criterion without replacing its internal order condition by the weaker condition on global truth values.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 21 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A regular category has finite limits, coequalizers of kernel pairs, and regular epimorphisms stable under pullback. Equivalently, every morphism factors as a regular epimorphism followed by a monomorphism, and these factorizations are stable under pullback. A regular functor preserves finite limits and regular epimorphisms, hence also preserves these image factorizations.
For this question, the capital regular category convention is the one in which every well-supported object is a well-pointed object in a category. Here an object is well-supported if is a regular epimorphism. It is well-pointed if a subobject through which every point factors must be the whole object. This convention is documented in Definitions 1.1–1.3. It imposes no such point-detection requirement on objects whose support is a proper subobject of . In particular, it should not be replaced here by the stronger assertion that reflects every isomorphism.
First prove two facts about a capital regular category . Every well-supported object has a point. Otherwise is well-supported and has no points, so its diagonal contains all points and is invertible. That makes a subterminal object; the regular epimorphism is then also monic and hence invertible, contradicting the absence of a point. If is a regular epimorphism and is a point, its pullback in a category is a well-supported object over , so it has a point lifting . Thus the representable functorpreserves regular epimorphisms; it already preserves all existing limits. Hence is a regular functor. Second, if is a singleton, its unique point is a monomorphism, is well-supported, and contains all points of . Well-pointedness makes invertible. Thus reflects terminal objects, even though it need not reflect arbitrary isomorphisms.
Now let be a small category that is a regular category. For each object , its slice category is small and regular: finite limits, images and the stability of regular epimorphisms are computed using the corresponding constructions in . By the permitted capitalization result choose a conservative functor that is regular,with a small capital regular category. The base-change functor , given by , preserves finite limits and regular epimorphisms. So doesTaking these as the coordinates defines a regular functorThe exponent is a set of indices, so this is a power of the Category of sets, with finite limits and regular epimorphisms computed coordinatewise.
To prove reflection of isomorphisms, suppose is invertible for . In , the object is the pullback of along the point given by the diagonal . Applying shows that is the fibre of the bijection over this diagonal point, and is a singleton. The preceding lemma gives through its canonical arrow to . Since reflects isomorphisms, is invertible. Its underlying morphism is . Therefore
In the small-category setting of this representation result, the elementary condition for replacing the power by one copy of is:This is almost total support for a regular category. “Strict initial” means initial and every arrow into it is invertible; the condition allows the case in which all objects are well-supported and no initial object exists.
For necessity, let be regular and conservative. If , factor through its support of an object in a regular category . Preservation of images gives . Conservativity makes invertible, so is well-supported. If , then for every the projection is sent to the bijection , hence is invertible. Its inverse followed by the other projection supplies an arrow . For any two such arrows, their equalizer is sent to a bijection onto , hence is invertible, proving uniqueness. Thus is initial. If exists, then exists, so and that arrow is sent to a bijection. Conservativity makes it invertible. Hence is strict initial.
For sufficiency, choose the permitted conservative regular functor into a small capital regular category, and put . This is regular. A well-supported object of is sent to a well-supported object of , which has a point. A non-well-supported object is strict initial by the condition, and is consequently a proper subterminal object. The functor preserves subterminality and reflects the noninvertibility of its arrow to ; its image is a proper subterminal object and has no points. Thus is empty exactly on the non-well-supported objects.
Suppose is a bijection for . If both sets are empty, and are strict initial objects and is invertible. Otherwise are well-supported. Factor as a regular epimorphism followed by a monomorphism . Surjectivity of makes every point of factor through ; capitality of makes invertible. Hence is a regular epimorphism. Its kernel pair is well-supported, because and are regular epimorphisms. Injectivity of implies that every point of has equal coordinates, and therefore factors through the diagonal . Since is well-pointed, this diagonal is invertible. Thus is also monic, hence an isomorphism, and conservativity of makes invertible. This proves sufficiency with actual point and image arguments, rather than asserting that global sections of every capital regular category is conservative.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 20 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A local operator, also called a Lawvere-Tierney topology, is a map which internally satisfiesThe closure operation of a local operator sends a mono with characteristic map to the subobject classified by . It is inflationary, idempotent and pullback-stable. A mono is j-dense if its closure is its whole codomain, and j-closed if it equals its closure. A j-sheaf is an object for which restrictionis a bijection for every j-dense mono ; requiring only injectivity defines a j-separated object.
Here is a construction underlying the sheaf reflector for a local operator. The closed-subobject classifier is a j-sheaf: closed subobjects on a dense subobject extend uniquely by taking their closure in the larger object. Powers are also sheaves, because products of a dense mono with remain dense. A j-closed subobject of a sheaf is a sheaf: first extend a map into the ambient sheaf, then use density to force its image into the closed subobject.
Close the diagonal of . Its j-closure is an equivalence relation, using preservation of finite meets and pullback-stability to verify transitivity. The effective quotient is the separated reflection: every map from into a separated object identifies that closed diagonal and factors uniquely. For separated , the closed-singleton mapis monic. Its j-closed image closure is a sheaf, and is dense. Unique extension across that mono, following the separated quotient factorization, provesfor every sheaf . This proves reflectivity. The closure construction is pullback-stable; equivalently, separated quotients and the subsequent dense embeddings commute with the finite limiting comparisons, giving the usual left-exact sheaf reflector.
Finite limits of sheaves are computed in , because unique extensions can be taken componentwise. If is a sheaf, is a sheaf for any , by the same product-with-dense-mono argument. Thus sheaf exponentials are the ambient exponentials. Monos between sheaves have j-closed images: their closure is a sheaf, and the dense inclusion into it splits by the extension property, hence is an isomorphism. Therefore classifies precisely their subobjects. These observations establish is a reflective topos.
Now let classify the given subterminal object. Its open local operator and closed local operator areThe Heyting algebra identities verify all local-operator axioms: implication by fixed preserves meets and is idempotent, while adjoining preserves meets by distributivity and is idempotent.
For a mono in with characteristic predicate , closedness for means , or . Density for means , again . Thus the c(U)-closed monos are exactly the o(U)-dense monos.
Both densities together force and , hence : the only jointly dense monos are isomorphisms. More explicitly, the meet of these operators is pointwise andso .
For their join, every mono factors through the union with the pullback :The first mono is c(U)-dense, because adjoining fills its codomain; the second is o(U)-dense, because its image contains . Any local operator above both must therefore make every mono dense, since its dense monos are closed under composition. It is the largest operator . ConsequentlyThese are the complementary open and closed local operators in the ordered lattice of local operators, with order given by pointwise implication.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 119 2 Solution Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-03
Let be a subterminal object in a Cartesian closed category. For every and , the exponential object adjunction givesThe set on the right has at most one element because is subterminal. Hence is subterminal, proving that is an exponential ideal.
Now let be reflective, with reflector and unit . Recall the useful form of its universal property: an object lies in precisely when every map factors uniquely through .
Suppose first that is an exponential ideal. Reflective subcategories are closed under ambient limits, so lies in . Given with , curry in the first variable to obtain . Since , this factors uniquely through and uncurries to . Curry once more, now in ; since , the result factors uniquely through . Thus every factors uniquely throughThis makes a reflection of , so uniqueness of reflections gives
Conversely, suppose preserves binary products, and take . To prove , start with and let be its transpose. Since is reflective, factors uniquely throughComposing the resulting map with and currying produces an extension of . Product preservation identifies the unit on with , so the same universal property proves uniqueness. Therefore is reflective, and is an exponential ideal. This proves the reflector product criterion for an exponential ideal.
Finally consider the arrow category . For arrows and , letThen the exponential is the arrowIndeed, a commutative square from to this arrow is, after currying, exactly a commutative square . This establishes the required exponential adjunction and proves that is cartesian closed.
If is injective, two elements and of haveso injectivity gives . Hence is injective. The category of injective functions is therefore an exponential ideal in the arrow category. Its terminal object and binary products are inherited pointwise, so these same exponential objects make cartesian closed.
Support of an object in a regular category 2026-10-14
The support of an object in a regular category is the subterminal object appearing as the image of a morphism in a regular category of . A regular functor preserves this construction. In the Category of sets, the support is the empty set if is empty and a singleton otherwise.