For teleportation with an ambiguous Bell-state phase label, write . The Bell-basis measurement outcomes and each occur with probability . In either case a correct guess gives Bob , while the wrong guess differs by the Pauli Z gate and gives . The other two Bell states are identified correctly. Since Alice guesses each ambiguous label with probability , the overall wrong-correction probability is . Averaging over the actual quantum measurement outcome and her guess gives the phase-flip channel
Conditional only on an ambiguous analyzer result, the output is ; that conditional channel has weight in the displayed unconditional result. There is no rejection of those rounds.
Use the teleportation fidelity for a pure state target, namely the squared quantum fidelity
This compares the input with the resulting mixed state; averaging state vectors before forming a density matrix would give a different, incorrect answer. Direct substitution gives
Thus the maximum is , attained by and up to a global phase, because these are eigenstates of the Pauli Z gate. The minimum is , attained by every equal-weight quantum superposition
on the equator of the Bloch sphere. The unsquared quantum fidelity is if that alternative convention is used. No average over different input quantum states is needed for the requested state-dependent answer.
In quantum teleportation, Alice transfers an arbitrary unknown qubit using one shared Bell pair and two bits of classical communication. Define , with . Regrouping the initial three-qubit state into this Bell basis gives
Alice's Bell-basis measurement selects each label with probability . She sends to Bob, who applies the inverse , restoring . The correction depends on the measurement label, not on the unknown amplitudes. Before the message, Bob's average state is , independent of the input; quantum no-signalling therefore prevents superluminal communication. The shared pair is consumed and Alice does not retain an independent copy, in agreement with the no-cloning theorem.
The Bouwmeester quantum teleportation experiment used photon polarization, a down-conversion entangled pair, a beam-splitter Bell-state analyzer and coincidence-conditioned output polarization measurements. Temporal indistinguishability of the two analyzer photons was essential. Its successful selected Bell outcome demonstrated the state transfer, rather than a deterministic implementation of all four outcomes.[ref]
The general experimental tasks are to distribute entanglement, prepare and synchronize the input, perform a sufficiently discriminating joint measurement, communicate the label and apply or account for the correction. A demonstration must test nonorthogonal input states, not merely transfer a known classical basis label. Finite efficiency, accidental coincidences, distinguishability and phase drift reduce success probability or teleportation fidelity. Postselected verification, a heralded usable output and unconditional deterministic teleportation are distinct experimental claims.
Suppose a perfect Bell pair is used for quantum teleportation, but the sender cannot distinguish the and Bell-basis measurement outcomes and guesses their labels uniformly. Each of the four actual outcomes has probability . Either ambiguous outcome gives an incorrect Pauli Z gate correction with conditional probability , so the total phase-flip probability is . The unconditional output is therefore the displayed phase-flip channel. For , its teleportation fidelity is . It ranges from on the Bloch sphere equator to at its poles. This averages the output density operators, including the ambiguous rounds.