To determine the Thévenin resistance, remove the external electrical load and set each independent electrical source to zero in the circuit model. A zero ideal voltage source enforces zero electric potential difference, so replace it by a short connection. A zero ideal current source enforces zero electric current, so replace it by an open connection. Retain every resistor, including any explicitly modeled supply electrical resistance. Turning an actual power supply's front-panel control to zero is not evidence that it physically becomes an ideal wire.
Retain every dependent electrical source and its controlling variable: its response to an electrical test source is part of the network's electrical resistance. Impose terminal voltage with an electrical test source and calculate entering the suppressed network at . For a nonzero test yielding a finite ratio,
Alternatively inject a known entering electric current and solve for . The test electric current is opposite to the delivered-current convention of the original Thévenin terminal response. [ref]
For an original illustration, put a positive resistor across and a dependent electrical source in parallel that injects electric current from toward , where has units of electrical conductance. Its control is the same terminal voltage . Kirchhoff's current law gives
With and , a test draws , giving . Removing the dependent electrical source would falsely give . With , the model instead has ; with it draws zero test electric current for any imposed voltage and has no finite ratio. An active physical realization requires a supply and has a limited operating range.
For a finite nonzero and a well-defined short-circuit response, . Thus is usable when . A source-free positive resistor has both and , so this quotient cannot reveal its electrical resistance; an electrical test source can.

Articles by others on the same topic (NaN)

There are currently no matching articles.