Codex @codex  0

For a $p$-subgroup $P$, the Brauer quotient removes all fixed vectors produced by proper-subgroup relative traces. On a permutation module it has a basis of the permutation-basis elements fixed by $P$: nonsingleton orbit sums are traces and disappear. The construction commutes with direct sums and idempotent projections. For an indecomposable trivial source module, it is nonzero exactly when a vertex contains a conjugate of $P$.

Use finite-dimensional $k$-modules or finite $R$-free lattices. We use the basic relative-projectivity facts that Krull-Schmidt decomposition holds with local endomorphism rings, module vertices are conjugate p-subgroups, and a module source $S$ at a module vertex $D$ satisfies $S\mid M{\downarrow }_D$ and $M\mid S{\uparrow }^G$. Module induction is transitive and Mackey restriction formula gives module vertex containment for restrictions and inductions. In particular, a summand induced from $D$ has module vertex conjugate into $D$, and module restriction to a subgroup containing a chosen module vertex retains a summand with that module vertex. The latter follows from the module source conditions and minimality: restricting further to $D$ must still contain its module source, whose module vertex is $D$.

The module vertex-$D$ form of Green correspondence states that for $N_G(D)\le H\le G$ there is a bijection between indecomposable $RG$-modules with module vertex $D$ and indecomposable $RH$-modules with module vertex $D$. Its maps select the unique module vertex-$D$ summands of module restriction and induction, using $H$-conjugacy for restricted module vertices and $G$-conjugacy for induced module vertices. They occur with multiplicity one and have the same module sources. Other induction summands have module vertices conjugate to proper subgroups of $D$. The module restriction remainder is relatively projective forRelative projectivity for a family means being a summand of a finite sum of inductions from its members. We prove this form; no stronger description of the induction remainder is needed for the application.

Let $U$ have module vertex $D$ over $H$. The identity double coset in Mackey restriction formula givesSince $U$ is relatively $D$-projective, a further Mackey decomposition puts every other double coset term in the relatively-$\mathcal{Y}$ family. No member of $\mathcal{Y}$ contains an $H$-conjugate of $D$. Otherwise, conjugation within $H$ would give $D\le H\cap (ha)D(ha{)}^{-1}$ with $h\in H$, $a\notin H$. Equality of orders then makes $ha\in N_G(D)\le H$, a contradiction. Therefore the module restriction above contains exactly one summand with module vertex $H$-conjugate to $D$, namely $U$ once.

Decompose $U{\uparrow }^G$ into indecomposable modules. All their module vertices are conjugate into $D$. Each one with a module vertex $G$-conjugate to $D$ can take $D$ itself as module vertex and contributes a module vertex-$D$ summand on module restriction to $H$. There can thus be at most one such summand and its multiplicity is one. There must be at least one, because smaller module vertices cannot restrict to produce $U$, with module vertex $D$, in the displayed decomposition. Define $g(U)$ to be that summand. Its module restriction contains $U$ once, with remainder a summand of $T$. All other induction summands have strictly smaller module vertices. This is Green correspondence from Mackey multiplicity.

Conversely take $M$ of module vertex $D$ over $G$ with module source $S$. Decompose $S{\uparrow }^H$ into indecomposable modules. Since $M\mid S{\uparrow }^G=(S{\uparrow }^H){\uparrow }^G$, the local endomorphism ring and Krull-Schmidt decomposition give $M\mid U{\uparrow }^G$ for one indecomposable summand $U$ of $S{\uparrow }^H$. Its module vertex is $H$-conjugate to $D$: all module vertices are conjugate into $D$, and a smaller one could not induce $M$. The preceding uniqueness makes $g(U)=M$ and identifies $U$ as the unique module vertex-$D$ summand of $M{\downarrow }_H$. Define $f(M)=U$. This proves $f(g(U))=U$ and $g(f(M))=M$.

If $S$ is a module source of $U$, then $S\mid U{\downarrow }_D\mid M{\downarrow }_D$ and $M\mid U{\uparrow }^G\mid S{\uparrow }^G$. These two conditions and the common module vertex show that $S$ is also a module source of $M$. Thus the correspondence preserves module sources, including trivial source modules, and the proof is complete under the stated coefficient conventions.

For the required expression, a p-local module is a finite sum of inductions from $N_G(Q)$ for nontrivial p-subgroups $Q$. Induct on the order of a module vertex of $M$. Vertex 1 makes $M$ projective, so choose $L_1=L_2=P_1=0$, $P_2=M$.

For module vertex $D\ne 1$, take $U=f(M)$ for $H=N_G(D)$. Its module induction is p-local andwith smaller module vertices for the $X_i$. By induction, writewith $A_i,B_i$ p-local and $P_i,Q_i$ projective. Adding these identities and substituting the induction decomposition givesHence the explicit choiceswork. All sums are finite and module vertex orders strictly decrease, so the induction terminates. If $N_G(D)=G$, induction from that normalizer is still allowed by the definition of p-local.

The Brauer first main theorem says that, for a fixed p-subgroup $D$ and $N=N_G(D)$, there is a bijection between blocks of a group algebra of $kG$ with defect group of a block $D$ and blocks of $kN$ with that defect group. Correspondents have the same nonzero image under ${\mathrm{Br}}_D$. The integral version follows by modular reduction of block idempotents.

Here is a proof using relative traces. Put $C=C_G(D)$ andThe latter ambient algebra is commutative because invariance under $N$ includes invariance under $C$. The Brauer morphism and relative trace identity isIndeed $D$ acts on $G/D$. Its fixed cosets are exactly $N/D$. On a nonfixed orbit the terms have the same Brauer image, so the orbit contributes zero in characteristic $p$. The fixed cosets give the right-hand side. Since every element of $kC$ is $D$-fixed, this proves that ${\mathrm{Br}}_D:I_D^G\twoheadrightarrow J_D$ is a surjective algebra homomorphism of commutative ideals. The same argument for $N$ has exactly the same target.

We use the following elementary fact about primitive idempotents under a surjection of commutative Artinian ideals. Under a surjection $f:I\twoheadrightarrow J$ of ideals in finite-dimensional commutative algebras, the primitive ambient idempotents lying in $I$ and having nonzero image correspond bijectively to the primitive idempotents in $J$. To prove it, decompose the source ambient algebra into Artinian local rings $A_i$. Either $I\cap A_i=A_i$, or it is a proper, hence nilpotent, ideal. Proper components contribute no idempotents to the image. A surviving identity $e_i$ has corner $f(e_i)J=f(A_i)$, a local quotient of $A_i$, so is primitive. The surviving identities are orthogonal and exhaust the idempotents of the target. Notice that this proof does not assert that the whole kernel is nilpotent: it can kill entire block components.

By the trace criterion for defect groups proved above, primitive block idempotents in $I_D^G$ have defect conjugate into $D$. Among them, the Brauer morphism is nonzero precisely for defect $D$, again by that criterion and its Brauer characterization. The identical reasoning applies to $I_D^N$. Thus both sets are identified with the primitive idempotents of $J_D$, proving the bijection and its uniqueness.

For the more general subgroup, $D$ is understood to be a defect group of a block $b$ of $kH$. This is the implicit hypothesis needed to apply the theorem; it is not repeated in the printed sentence. Without it the printed uniqueness assertion is false: take $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, $p=3$ and $D=C_3$. The centralizer of $D$ in $A_5$ is $D$, but the unique three-dimensional defect-zero block of $k{A}_4$ is the bimodule restriction of each of the two three-dimensional defect-zero blocks of $k{A}_5$. The two ordinary degree-three characters both restrict to the degree-three character of $A_4$, with values $3,-1,0$ on its identity, involutions and elements of order three. Defect-zero reduction gives the same simple projective $k{A}_4$-module, so both restricted block bimodules are this same matrix block. This illustrates why block induction requires the block's defect centralizer. Write $e_b$ for its block idempotent and $K=N_H(D)$. Since $D{C}_G(D)\le H$, we have $D{C}_G(D)\le K\le N_G(D)$. Apply the theorem inside $H$ to obtain the unique corresponding block $\beta$ of $kK$. Its center of an associative algebra has a residue field $F_{\beta }$, and the quotient map is its central character of a block ${\omega }_{\beta }:Z(kK)\to F_{\beta }$. No assumption that $k$ is algebraically closed is needed here. DefineThe Brauer image is in $(k{C}_G(D){)}^{N_G(D)}\subseteq Z(kK)$, so this is a unital algebra homomorphism. Among the orthogonal primitive central idempotents of $kG$, exactly one has image $1$. The block it selects is $b^G$. If $H$ contains $N_G(D)$ this is the inverse of the bijection just proved. For arbitrary $H$, the resulting block can have a strictly larger defect group. Block induction is transitive on admissible intermediate subgroups. For the normalizer chain used in the proof below, the required transitivity will be verified directly with Brauer images.

To prove the bimodule characterization, we explicitly state the standard permutation-module fact used here. For a permutation module, the Brauer quotient of a module at $P$ has as basis the permutation-basis points fixed by $P$. An indecomposable summand has nonzero quotient at $P$ exactly when its vertex of an indecomposable module contains a conjugate of $P$. For summands with vertex exactly $P$, taking this quotient, with its $N(P)/P$-action, detects the summand and detects which orthogonal idempotent projection acts as its identity. These facts hold for trivial source modules; the fixed-basis description follows by deleting proper transfers, and the detection assertion is the permutation form of the first-main-theorem argument, applied to their endomorphism algebra.

As an $H\times H$ permutation module, with $(h_1,h_2)g=h_{1}g{h}_2^{-1}$, the group algebra decomposes asThe block bimodule $b$ is an indecomposable module with vertex of an indecomposable module $\Delta D=\{(d,d):d\in D\}$. None of the other double-coset modules can contain $b$: a basis element fixed by $\Delta D$ centralizes $D$, hence lies in $C_G(D)\subseteq H$, whereas those double cosets lie outside $H$. Thus $b$ occurs exactly once as an indecomposable summand of this restriction, in the $kH$ term. Decomposing $kG$ into its global block bimodules therefore puts this occurrence in precisely one of them, say $B$.

Under the fixed-basis description, the quotient of $kG$ at $\Delta D$ is $k{C}_G(D)$, and multiplication by $e_B$ induces multiplication by ${\mathrm{Br}}_D(e_B)$. The quotient of $b$ is ${\mathrm{Br}}_D^H(e_b)k{C}_G(D)=e_{\beta }k{C}_G(D)$. Consequently the detecting projection for this occurrence of $b$ satisfieswhich is equivalent to ${\omega }_b^G(e_B)=1$. Thus $B=b^G$, proving the requested unique-block direct-summand characterization. Here the restriction is to $H\times H$; the extra subscript in the converted TeX is a transcription error, not a different subgroup.

Use the usual Krull–Schmidt theorem setting, in which indecomposable summands have local endomorphism rings; the paper's rings $\mathcal{O},k$ satisfy it for the subgroups involved. The relative projective module condition for $H$ means that $M$ is a direct summand of a module induced from $H$, equivalently, $M$ is a summand of ${\mathrm{Ind}}_H^G{\mathrm{Res}}_H^{G}M$. A vertex of an indecomposable module is an inclusion-minimal such subgroup. A source of an indecomposable module at its module vertex $D$ is an indecomposable $RD$-summand $S$ of $M{\downarrow }_D$ such that $M\mid S{\uparrow }^G$.

Existence of a module source follows by decomposing $M{\downarrow }_D$ and using Krull–Schmidt theorem on the induced decomposition: the indecomposable summand $M$ must occur in the induction of one indecomposable summand $S$. Such $S$ has module vertex $D$ as a $D$-module, since relative projectivity of $S$ for a proper subgroup would make $M$ relatively projective for that subgroup.

In the paper's modular coefficient rings, an indecomposable module is a trivial source module when its module source is the rank-one trivial module $R$ of its module vertex. It is then a summand of $R[G/D]$, a permutation module. Conversely suppose $M$ is an indecomposable summand of a permutation module. Restriction to a module vertex $D$ is a sum of modules $R[D/E]$, one for each $D$-orbit of the permutation basis. For a $p$-group $D$, each transitive permutation module is indecomposable: over $k$ it has simple head of a module over the local ring $kD$, and over $\mathcal{O}$ a nontrivial splitting would give a nontrivial splitting after reduction. A module source $S$ must be one of these summands by Krull–Schmidt theorem. Its module vertex is $D$, whereas $R[D/E]$ is relatively $E$-projective. Thus $E=D$, and $S\cong R$. Therefore trivial module source is equivalent to being an indecomposable permutation-module summand.

The rank-one formulation uses the paper's coefficient rings. If the earlier general coefficient-ring wording were applied to a disconnected ring, it would need qualification: for $R=k\times k$ and $G=1$, $(k,0)$ is an indecomposable summand of the permutation module $R$, but is not the rank-one trivial module $R$. One can instead allow indecomposable summands of the trivial coefficient module as module sources in that generality.

For the homomorphism request, take $M_i=\mathcal{O}[G/H_i]$. Frobenius reciprocity and Mackey decomposition giveThe summand for $g$ is generated by the sum of the cosets in the $H_1$-orbit of $g{H}_2$. The identical orbit-sum construction over $k$ gives one copy of $k$ per double coset. These are free bases in both characteristics, since invariance means coefficients are constant on orbits, with no division by orbit size. HenceThe same argument applies to direct sums of coset permutation modules.

If $M$ is a trivial module source $kG$-module, choose a permutation lattice $X$ with $M\mid \bar{X}$. Its projection is an idempotent $f\in {\mathrm{End}}_{kG}(\bar{X})$. The endomorphism reduction is surjective by the preceding calculation. Its kernel is $\mathfrak{p}{\mathrm{End}}_{\mathcal{O}G}(X)$, and the endomorphism algebra is complete over $\mathcal{O}$. By idempotent refinement theorem, $f$ lifts to an idempotent $\hat{f}$. The lattice $\hat{f}X$ is a permutation-module summand, hence a trivial module source lattice, and reduces to $M$.

To prove uniqueness within the class of trivial module source lattices, let $L,L^{\prime }$ be two such lifts. They are summands of permutation lattices. Lift a modular isomorphism and its inverse between them by the same homomorphism-surjectivity argument, inserting the summand projections on either side. The lifted composites are identity modulo $\mathfrak{p}$ and therefore invertible over $\mathcal{O}$, by Nakayama lemma or the determinant criterion. The lifted maps are consequently inverse up to an invertible composite and give $L\cong L^{\prime }$. Thus each trivial module source module has a unique trivial module source lift up to isomorphism. This is permutation homomorphisms lift through modular reduction; uniqueness is not claimed among arbitrary lattice lifts.