A dynamic subgrid-scale model estimates its closure coefficient from the resolved flow as the calculation proceeds. In a common construction, a second, coarser test filter probes interactions among resolved scales, providing information for a subgrid-scale model below the original resolution.[ref]
Write a bar for the original spatial averaging filter and a hat for the test filter. Define
Direct subtraction gives the Germano identity
The rightmost expression uses only resolved quantities. The identity is exact for these definitions; extrapolating a closure between the filter levels is the modeling step.[ref]
For instance, suppose a chosen closure writes the deviatoric stresses as and , and assumes can be taken outside the test filtering. Then , where . One way to choose is to minimize . Differentiation gives
when the denominator is nonzero. This is a least squares fit of a scalar to tensor data. In a one-component illustrative fit, and give .
The coefficient need not remain positive. Depending on the closure, a negative value can permit turbulent backscatter, but a small denominator can also make an estimate unreliable. Averaging, bounds and treatment of weak strain are additional choices. Dynamically fitting a coefficient does not remove these assumptions or make unresolved motion observable.
Smagorinsky model 2026-11-05
The Smagorinsky model approximates the deviatoric subgrid-scale stress using an eddy viscosity determined by the resolved strain-rate tensor:
Here , is the filter length, is dimensionless, and repeated indices use the Einstein summation convention. The Kronecker delta selects the isotropic part. The construction estimates a missing effect from resolved deformation rather than calculating each unresolved eddy.[ref]
For simple shear flow , the only nonzero strain components are , giving . Taking , and yields
These are illustrative parameter choices, not a universal fitted constant. The dimensions follow from .
For an incompressible flow, the resolved-to-unresolved kinetic energy transfer is
A nonnegative eddy viscosity thus removes resolved kinetic energy and cannot represent local turbulent backscatter. Coefficients and near-wall treatment require physical and numerical judgment.
Joseph Smagorinsky's 1963 atmospheric-circulation experiment used a lateral exchange coefficient based on horizontal deformation and a length scale. The modern three-dimensional expression above extends that strain-dependent modeling idea; it should not be mistaken for the complete original atmospheric model.[ref]
Subgrid-scale model 2026-11-05
A subgrid-scale model represents the influence of unresolved motion on the quantities retained in a large eddy simulation. Its need follows directly from the nonlinear velocity product in the Navier-Stokes equations: averaging a product generally differs from multiplying the averages.
Let a bar denote a spatial averaging filter. With constant mass density , constant kinematic viscosity , and a time-independent translation-invariant filter on an unbounded or periodic domain, filtering the incompressible momentum equation gives
where repeated indices use the Einstein summation convention, is pressure, and the subgrid-scale stress in this sign convention is
The assumed filter commutes with the displayed derivatives. The definition of is exact; a closure must approximate it using available resolved information.[ref]
For an elementary example, average two equally weighted values of one velocity component, and . The mean is zero but the mean square is , so the corresponding stress component is . A resolved mean alone has lost the information needed to reconstruct that covariance.
The Smagorinsky model closes the deviatoric part with an eddy viscosity:
where is the Kronecker delta, is the resolved strain-rate tensor, a dimensionless model coefficient and a characteristic filter width. The isotropic stress can be included in a modified pressure. This strain-dependent viscosity has its historical origin in Joseph Smagorinsky's atmospheric circulation modelling.[ref][ref]
For an incompressible flow, the model transfers resolved kinetic energy out at the rate per unit mass
A fixed nonnegative eddy viscosity therefore permits dissipation but excludes local turbulent backscatter. A dynamic subgrid-scale model can instead estimate its coefficient from resolved stresses at two filter levels. This addresses a modelling choice, rather than changing the exact definition of the unresolved stress.[ref]
Turbulent backscatter 2026-11-05
Turbulent backscatter is transfer of kinetic energy from unresolved or smaller spatial scales into larger resolved scales. In a large eddy simulation, its sign is defined relative to the chosen spatial averaging filter and subgrid-scale stress. It can occur locally even when the mean energy cascade transfers energy toward small scales.[ref]
With , the stress force in the filtered momentum equation is . Multiplying by gives
The first term transports kinetic energy through space. Because is symmetric, the second is , the local exchange with unresolved motion. Thus the forward-transfer convention
makes a gain of resolved kinetic energy.
For a trace-free resolved strain and stress , with nonnegative ,
Taking and produces backscatter even though the stress matrix is positive semidefinite. Positivity of a weighted covariance does not fix the sign of its contraction with an indefinite strain tensor.
The Smagorinsky model with nonnegative eddy viscosity instead gives . A dynamic subgrid-scale model can allow the reverse sign. Backscatter describes exchange between scales, not negative molecular viscous dissipation or creation of total energy.