Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 16 2 iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We first justify surjectivity is preserved by base change for morphisms of schemes. Given over and a point over , the fiber after the residue-field extension contains a point becauseIndeed, tensoring a nonzero vector space over a field with a field extension remains nonzero; a nonzero commutative ring has a prime ideal, giving the required point. Thus every base change of is surjective.
Now make an arbitrary base change . For a closed subset , its inverse image under is closed. The proper morphism therefore has closed image on that inverse image. Surjectivity of givesso is closed. This proves that is a universally closed morphism. Together with the given separatedness and finite type, it proves
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 16 2 Solution 2026-10-14
A proper morphism of schemes is a separated morphism of finite type which is a universally closed morphism: after every base change, the resulting map of underlying topological spaces takes closed subsets to closed subsets.
The valuative criterion for properness, in the Noetherian setting used here, says that a finite type morphism is a proper morphism if and only if the following existence and uniqueness condition holds. For every valuation ring , its fraction field , and compatible morphisms of schemes and with , there is exactly one morphism of schemes such that and . All valuation rings are allowed; no discreteness assumption is needed in this formulation. The following arguments also use that each of the three defining conditions for a proper morphism is preserved by base change.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 113 1 a Solution 2026-09-28
A morphism of schemes is proper when it is a finite type morphism, a separated morphism, and a universally closed morphism. The valuative criterion for properness says, under the usual finite-type and Noetherian hypotheses, that is proper exactly when every commutative squarewith a discrete valuation ring and has a unique diagonal lift .
For , a -point is with not all zero. If is a uniformizer, multiply all coordinates by one power of so that . The resulting coordinates lie in and at least one is a unit, so they define an -point extending the given -point. If two extensions exist, on a chart where one coordinate is a unit their affine coordinate ratios agree in and therefore in the integral domain ; hence the extensions agree. This verifies existence and uniqueness directly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 113 1 b Solution 2026-09-28
Take the projective line with a doubled point over , obtained by gluing two copies of along the complement of one point. After every base change of a morphism of schemes, a closed subset has closed image from each of the two projective-line charts, so its total image, the union of those two images, is closed. The structure morphism is therefore universally closed. The two doubled points have no disjoint neighborhoods, so the scheme is not separated and hence is not proper.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 113 2 a Solution 2026-09-28
Each property is local on the target. Finite type is local by its affine definition. The restrictions of the diagonal morphism of over the open sets are closed immersions; since being a closed subset is local on an open cover, the diagonal itself is a closed immersion, so is separated. Finally, after any base change , the inverse images cover . For every closed , its image has closed intersection with every because the restricted base-changed morphism is closed. The image is therefore closed in . Thus is universally closed and hence proper. This proves that properness is local on the target.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 113 2 a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The fibre product of schemes comes with projections to and having equal composites to , and is universal with this property. A morphism is universally closed when every base change is closed on underlying topological spaces.
The structural morphism is closed because its target has one point, but it is not universally closed. After base change by , it becomes the projection ; the closed hyperbola has image , which is not closed.
For a finite-type universally closed nonseparated example, glue two copies of along the complement of one rational point, producing a projective line with a doubled point. It is of finite type. After every base change, each of its two projective-line charts maps closedly to the base, so the image of any closed subset, being the union of the two closed images, is closed. Thus the structural morphism is universally closed. It is not separated because the two doubled points violate uniqueness in the valuative criterion for separatedness, or equivalently because its diagonal is not closed.