OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Valuation ring need not equal the integral closure over a noncomplete field

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Mathematics Area of mathematics Arithmetic Non-Archimedean analysis Absolute value on a field Extension of an absolute value
2026-09-28  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
Give Q its 5-adic valuation, take L=Q(i), and choose the extension associated with the prime (2+i). Then (2+i)/(2−i) lies in the chosen valuation ring but has negative valuation at the conjugate prime. It is therefore not in the integral closure of Z(5)​ in L.

 Ancestors (7)

  1. Extension of an absolute value
  2. Absolute value on a field
  3. Non-Archimedean analysis
  4. Arithmetic
  5. Area of mathematics
  6. Mathematics
  7.  Home

 Incoming links (1)

  • Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2021 / iii / Paper 136 / 2 / b / Solution

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook