Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 82 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Consider a nonreal phase velocity , so never vanishes. Substitute into the Rayleigh equation for inviscid shear flow. Differentiating cancels the two terms involving , leavingFor , the wall condition on normal velocity gives , hence , at both walls. Multiply by and use integration by parts to obtain the weighted identity for Howard's semicircle theorem:For a nonzero normal mode, . The imaginary and real parts of this identity give, respectively,Since , these implyThe first equation says that is a positive weighted mean of , and consequently . The division by is essential: the weighted-mean assertion concerns nonreal modes. A neutral mode may have a critical level where and the substitution for is singular.
Pointwise, . Integrating against the nonnegative weight and substituting both identities yieldsCompleting the square proves Howard's semicircle theorem:Thus all nonreal phase velocities lie in the closed disk with the real interval as diameter. For the convention and , exponentially growing normal modes occupy its upper semicircle, while decaying modes occupy its lower semicircle.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 331 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
First suppose and put . The wall condition gives . Substitution into the Rayleigh equation for inviscid shear flow givesMultiply by and use integration by parts. The resulting weighted identity for Howard's semicircle theorem isIts imaginary part gives , and its real part then gives . Set and . Since ,Completing the square proves Howard's semicircle theorem:In particular every growing normal mode lies in the upper semicircle for . If is real and outside , is again regular, but the same identity has a strictly positive integrand unless the mode vanishes. Such a neutral mode is impossible. Consequently neutral regular modes also satisfy the bound; no division by is needed for this last conclusion. The nonreal proof avoids critical-level singularities altogether.