{tag=Essays by Ciro Santilli}

The approach many courses take to physics, specially "modern Physics" is really bad, this is how it should be taught:
* start by describing experiments that the previous best theory did not explain, see also: <physics education needs more focus on understanding experiments and their history>{full}
* then, give the final formula for the next best theory
* then, give all the important final implications of that formula, and how it amazingly describes the experiments. In particular this means: <doing physics means calculating a number>
* then, give some mathematical intuition on the formulas, and how the main equation could have been derived
* finally, then and only then, start deriving the outcomes of the main formula in detail

This is likely because at some point, experiments get more and more complicated, and so people are tempted to say "this is the truth" instead of "this is why we think this is the truth", which is much harder.

But we can't be lazy, there is no replacement to the why.

Related:
* http://settheory.net/learnphysics and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MKjPYuD60I&list=PLJcTRymdlUQPwx8qU4ln83huPx-6Y3XxH from <settheory.net>
* https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html by <John Baez>. Mentions:
  > This webpage doesn't have lots of links to websites. Websites just don't have the sort of in-depth material you need to learn technical subjects like advanced math and physics — at least, not yet. To learn this stuff, you need to read lots of books
  <Ciro Santilli> is trying to change that: <OurBigBook.com>.
* https://web.archive.org/web/20210324182549/http://jakobschwichtenberg.com/one-thing/ by <Jakob Schwichtenberg>


How to teach and learn physics

ID: how-to-teach-and-learn-physics