ORCA Benchmark Created 2025-11-19 Updated 2025-11-30
This one doesn't seem to exciting to be honest, but it might be useful. Sample question:
If I deposit $50,000 at 5% APR, compounded weekly, what will my balance be after 18 months?
and it expects the correct answer down to the cents:
53892.27
It should be noted that Project Euler has such "precision matters" problems.
Closed AI math benchmark Created 2025-11-19 Updated 2025-12-13
Even more than in other areas of benchmarking, in maths where you only have a right or wrong answer, and it is costly to come up with good sample problems, some benchmarks have adopted private test data sets.
The situation is kind of sad, in that ideally we should have open data sets and only test them on models that were trained on data exclusively published before the problem publish date.
However this is not practical for the following reasons:
  • some of the best models are closed source and don't have a reproducible training with specified cutoff
  • having a private test set allows you to automatically check answers from untrusted sources. If they get answers right, they are onto something, you don't even need to check their methodology
Perhaps the ideal scenario therefore is what ARC-AGI has done: give a sizeable public dataset, which you feel is highly representative of the difficulty level of the private test data, while at the same time holding out some private test data. Half half seems reasonable.
This way, reproducible models can actually self test themselves reliably on the open data, while the closed data can then be used for the cases where the open data can't be used.
List of math AI benchmarks Created 2025-11-19 Updated 2025-12-13
3D-printed firearm 2025-11-18
Video 1.
3D Printed Guns Are Easy To Make And Impossible To Stop by VICE News (2018)
Source.
DIY gun 2025-11-18
Video 1.
The Unhinged World of DIY Guns by Qxir
. Source.
Here's an execution for 2, 3. When a != 1 we use a as the extra numbers instead of b:
 1 | 2 2(1) ...
 2 | 2 2(0) 2(1) ...
 3 | 3 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 4 | 3 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 5 | 2 3(2) 2(1) 2(0) 2(0) ...
 6 | 2 3(1) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 7 | 2 3(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 8 | 3 3(2) 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 9 | 3 3(1) 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
10 | 3 3(0) 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
11 | 2 2(1) 3(2) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
12 | 2 2(0) 3(2) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
13 | 3 2(1) 3(1) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
14 | 3 2(0) 3(1) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
15 | 2 2(1) 3(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
16 | 2 2(0) 3(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
17 | 3 3(2) 3(2) 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
Furthermore, note that if a = 1, then the a, b sequence is a subset of the b, a sequence e.g.:
1, 2 = [1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, ...]
2, 1 = [   2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, ...]
therefore we can always make a not be 1 by switching the pair and then using the generalized algorithm with a != 1.
This algorithm is more efficient in space, using only , as it recursively compresses the state required to keep track of what to do next.
Time is still .
The table at maths-people.anu.edu.au/~brent/pd/Kolakoski-UNSW.pdf page 20 has a summary image, but it is hard to understand.
Let's do a step by step version now.
The notation we use is as follows:
1 2 (1) 1 (1)
means that:
  • this is number 2
  • there is 1 occurrence count left
Note that column 1 does not need to keep a count so we use notation such as:
1 2(0) 1(1)
The starting state is:
2 | 2 2(1) 2(1) 2(1) 2(1) ...
which means that it implicitly contains infinitely many 2(1) at the end which we abbreviate just as:
2 | 2 2(1) ...
The actual algorithm will of course omit as many trailing 2(1) as it can.
The update rules are:
  • go left to right:
    • flip:
      x(0)       y(0)
      !x((!x)-1) unchanged
      continue going left to right.
    • repeat:
      x(0)   y(n > 0)
      x(x-1) y(n - 1)
      and then stop further updates.
Note that both rules don't overlap so that each update is always determined by only one of them at a time.
Also the first column is always implicitly (0).
Use column 2 up once to repeat column 1:
2 | 2 2(1) ...
3 | 2 2(0) 2(1) ...
Here we:
  • switch column 1 because column 2 reached 0 on previous step
  • use column 3 up once to repeat column 2
2 | 2 2(1) ...
3 | 2 2(0) 2(1) ...
4 | 1 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
  • use column 2 up once to repeat 1
2 | 2 2(1) ...
3 | 2 2(0) 2(1) ...
4 | 1 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
5 | 1 2(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 2 | 2 2(1) ...
 3 | 2 2(0) 2(1) ...
 4 | 1 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 5 | 1 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 6 | 2 1(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 7 | 1 1(0) 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 8 | 2 2(1) 1(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
 9 | 2 2(0) 1(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
10 | 1 1(0) 1(0) 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
11 | 2 2(1) 2(1) 1(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
12 | 2 2(0) 2(1) 1(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
13 | 1 2(1) 2(0) 1(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
14 | 1 2(0) 2(0) 1(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
15 | 2 1(0) 1(0) 1(0) 2(0) 2(0) 2(1) ...
16 | 1 2(1) 2(1) 2(1) 1(0) 2(1) 2(0) 2(1) ...
The generalized Kolakoski sequence is the generalization of the Kolakoski sequence where you don't need to restrict yourself to 1,2 but can instead use any a,b pair.
Project Euler problem 967 Created 2025-11-05 Updated 2025-12-13
Project Euler problem 966 Created 2025-11-05 Updated 2025-12-13
Numerical solution:
29337152.09
Programs:
Inkscape constraints 2025-11-05
What would be really amazing is if they had constraints like proper CAD software, it would make it possible to not have to redo entire diagrams when you want to change a small part of them.
Bibliography:
It should be noted however that path effects can accomplish some of it.
Monero Chan 2025-11-05
Porny anime Monero mascot commissioned by overly rich Monerists
Figure 1.
Monero Chan spanking IRS Chan's buttocks
.
Side project 2025-11-05
There is a Notable section of I, Claudius that stuck with Ciro Santilli:
The idea of writing the history pleased me very much: I felt that historical justice had never been done to the Carthaginians. I spent my leisure time in making a study of the ruins of the Old City, with the help of a contemporary survey, and familiarizing myself with the geography of the country in general. I also learned the rudiments of the language well enough to be able to read simple inscriptions and understand the few Phoenician words used by authors who have written about the Punic Wars from the Roman side. When I returned to Italy I began to write the book concurrently with my Etruscan history. I like having two tasks going at the same time: when I tire of one I turn to the other. But I am perhaps too careful a writer. I am not satisfied merely with copying from ancient authorities while there is any possible means of checking their statements by consulting other sources of information on the same subject, particularly accounts by writers of rival political parties. So these two histories, each of which I could have written in a year or two if I had been less conscientious, kept me busy between them for some twenty-five years. For every word I wrote I must have read many hundreds; and in the end I became a very good scholar both of Etruscan and Phoenician, and had a working knowledge of several other languages and dialects too, such as Numidian, Egyptian, Oscan, and Faliscan. I finished the History of Carthage first.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.