Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 37

Every invertible matrix $M$ can be written as:where:Note therefore that this decomposition is unique up to swapping the order of eigenvectors. We could fix a canonical form by sorting eigenvectors from smallest to largest in the case of a real number.

Intuitively, Note that this is just the change of basis formula, and so:

Whenever Ciro Santilli walks in front of a school and sees the tall gates it makes him sad. Maybe 8 year olds need gates. But do we need to protect 15 year olds like that? Students should be going out to see the world, both good and evil not hiding from it! We should instead be guiding them to the world. But instead, we are locking them up in brainwashing centers.

Video "The Purpose of Education by Noam Chomsky (2012)" puts it well, education can be either be:He has spoken about that infinitely, e.g. from when he was thin: www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVqMAlgAnlo

Bibliography:

Affiliation: University of São Paulo.

Applications:

Born: 1965

Died: 2010+-ish

This section is about companies that integrate parts and software from various other companies to make up fully working computer systems.

The japanese name literally means:

This section is about the definition of the dot product over ${\mathbb{C}}^n$, which extends the definition of the dot product over ${\mathbb{R}}^n$.

Some motivation is discussed at: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2459814/what-is-the-dot-product-of-complex-vectors/4300169#4300169

The complex dot product is defined as:

E.g. in ${\mathbb{C}}^1$:

We can see therefore that this is a form, and a positive definite because:

Just like the usual dot product, this will be a positive definite symmetric bilinear form by definition.

Triangle, tetrahedron.

The name does not imply regular by default. For regular ones, you should say "regular polytope".

Non-regular description: take convex hull take D + 1 vertices that are not on a single D-plan.

Besides the understandable Wikipedia definition, Video "Simple Groups - Abstract Algebra by Socratica (2018)" gives an understandable one:

We don't really know how to make up larger groups from smaller simple groups, which would complete the classification of finite groups:

In particular, this is hard because you can't just take the direct product of groups to retrieve the original group: Section "Relationship between the quotient group and direct products".